The Enzymology of the Cell Surface Tension at the Cell Surface 1954
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-5449-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tension at the Cell Surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scenario in which two small spherical cells combine into one larger spherical fusion product is known to occur in model systems such as chemically induced protoplast fusion (Senda et al, 1979;Boss, 1987) and in various fusions of spherical nucleated mammalian cells as induced by, for example, laser light pulses (Schierenberg, 1987;Steubing et al, 1991), chemicals (Lucy, 1978), and enveloped viruses (Knutton, 1977;Sarkar et al, 1989). Because surface (interfacial) tension is known to drive the rounding up of cell fragments (Harvey, 1954), the whole cell fusion process appears to take place in a manner that suggests that it is self-completing, passive, and otherwise essentially unremarkable. Understandably, as investigators gradually recognized that membrane fusion was a necessary condition for cell fusion and that membrane fusion could be investigated with molecular or near-molecular level paradigms, interest shifted from primarily descriptive studies (often in connection with genetic experiments) at the cell level (e.g., Harris, 1970;Ringertz and Savage, 1976) to what happens at the membrane level (Poste and Nicolson, 1978;White, 1992;Duzgunes, 1993a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scenario in which two small spherical cells combine into one larger spherical fusion product is known to occur in model systems such as chemically induced protoplast fusion (Senda et al, 1979;Boss, 1987) and in various fusions of spherical nucleated mammalian cells as induced by, for example, laser light pulses (Schierenberg, 1987;Steubing et al, 1991), chemicals (Lucy, 1978), and enveloped viruses (Knutton, 1977;Sarkar et al, 1989). Because surface (interfacial) tension is known to drive the rounding up of cell fragments (Harvey, 1954), the whole cell fusion process appears to take place in a manner that suggests that it is self-completing, passive, and otherwise essentially unremarkable. Understandably, as investigators gradually recognized that membrane fusion was a necessary condition for cell fusion and that membrane fusion could be investigated with molecular or near-molecular level paradigms, interest shifted from primarily descriptive studies (often in connection with genetic experiments) at the cell level (e.g., Harris, 1970;Ringertz and Savage, 1976) to what happens at the membrane level (Poste and Nicolson, 1978;White, 1992;Duzgunes, 1993a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus each cell or droplet has a diameter of 10 µm and the division takes place in several minutes. The membrane tension is taken to be 1·0 dyne/cm; this is consistent with values measured by Harvey [43] and Hochmuth [44].…”
Section: Model Results For Splittingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If we use typical values [43,46,18,44], i.e., σ = 1 dyne/cm, µ = 100 poise, R = 5 × 10 −4 cm for a leukocyte and θ e = 10 degrees ≈ 0·2 radian, the value of T * is about 150 seconds which seems a plausible value. Times much smaller than this would have very large cell deformations, as in Figure 3 for example.…”
Section: Energeticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The dielectrophortic force which draws the ghost membranes into contact via the so-called "pearl chain formation" is also known to cause a membrane deformation (Dimitrov et al, 1990) but only measurements can determine if a change in this force before or after the pulse could influence the fusion zone diameter versus time curves. It has been established that membrane fluidity is highly temperature-dependent (Kimmelberg, 1979) over temperature ranges likely to be encountered by a biomembrane but surface tension, expected to be a force in cell rounding (Harvey, 1954) is not expected to be strongly temperature-dependent. Thus, the effect of temperature on diameter versus time measurements is expected to provide a clue from this variable.…”
Section: Further Characterization Of the Diameter Versus Time Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%