2008
DOI: 10.36076/ppj.2008/11/355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tension Pseudomeningocele Associated with Retained Intrathecal Catheter: A Case Report with a Review of Literature

Abstract: Catheter related complications are not uncommon with permanently implanted intrathecal drug delivery systems. Pericatheter leak of cerebrospinal fluid usually responds to conservative treatment. We report a case of tension pseudomeningocele due to retained lumbar intrathecal catheter. It is essential to be aware of this rare complication and we recommend appropriate neurosurgical involvement in the management of pseudomeningocele to avoid potential and catastrophic complications. This case presents one of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 In addition, fragment size, development of a persistent CSF leak or pseudomeningocele, infection risk, and patient's desires all influence the decision to retrieve the catheter. 3,7 Asymptomatic patients can be managed conservatively; however, the literature has highlighted the potential dangers of observation only. Migration of a retained catheter could lead to a arachnoiditis/radiculopathy, abscess or granuloma formation or even subarachnoid hemorrhage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In addition, fragment size, development of a persistent CSF leak or pseudomeningocele, infection risk, and patient's desires all influence the decision to retrieve the catheter. 3,7 Asymptomatic patients can be managed conservatively; however, the literature has highlighted the potential dangers of observation only. Migration of a retained catheter could lead to a arachnoiditis/radiculopathy, abscess or granuloma formation or even subarachnoid hemorrhage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%