1944
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1944.11010298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensions And School Achievement Examinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hallwork (1 964), summarizing the results, felt that in general there is a slight negative correlation between measures of anxiety and the performance of secondary schoolchildren; amongst students the correlation is positive but again very small. Hastings (1961) found that there was an inverse relationship between tension and exams but stressed that his high tension group were not confined to those with low marks in exams. On the whole this group had a much more variable performance.…”
Section: Anxiety and Stressmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Hallwork (1 964), summarizing the results, felt that in general there is a slight negative correlation between measures of anxiety and the performance of secondary schoolchildren; amongst students the correlation is positive but again very small. Hastings (1961) found that there was an inverse relationship between tension and exams but stressed that his high tension group were not confined to those with low marks in exams. On the whole this group had a much more variable performance.…”
Section: Anxiety and Stressmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This trait has been chosen because of its likely relevance to achievement, and because Thornton [46], Ryans [47] and others have shown this trait to have general validity and to be capable of reliable assessment.…”
Section: Persistencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases a low negative correlation has been found (Sarason & Mandler, 1952;Sarason, 1957;Spielberger, 1959;Matarazzo, et al, 1954;Hastings, 1944;Sarnoff, et al, 1959;Kerrick, 1955;Purcell, et al, 1952;Calvin, et al, 1955;Zweibelson, 1956;Dreger & Aiken, 1957). The first two listed above were using the College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%