1993
DOI: 10.1016/0099-1333(93)90074-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tenure and promotion: A study of practices by institutional type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 Thus, it is possible to conclude that: The belief that librarians must publish or perish may be based on anecdotal evidence or on a few highly publicized cases, rather than established as fact. 38 The existing evidence shows that most tenure-track librarians are meeting tenure standards at the same or higher rate as instructional faculty. There is a notable lack of empirical support for the notion that librarians fail disproportionately to meet tenure standards (at either the university level or some lower review level) or choose to leave prior to final tenure review at higher rates than do other faculty.…”
Section: May 1999mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Thus, it is possible to conclude that: The belief that librarians must publish or perish may be based on anecdotal evidence or on a few highly publicized cases, rather than established as fact. 38 The existing evidence shows that most tenure-track librarians are meeting tenure standards at the same or higher rate as instructional faculty. There is a notable lack of empirical support for the notion that librarians fail disproportionately to meet tenure standards (at either the university level or some lower review level) or choose to leave prior to final tenure review at higher rates than do other faculty.…”
Section: May 1999mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Betsy Park and Robert Riggs reported on evaluative criteria used in promotion and tenure decisions for academic librarians. 2 Park and Riggs determined by survey that job performance was the primary factor in achieving tenure and promotion, followed by service and scholarship. 3 Park and Riggs also noted the distinction in expectations for research and publications among institutions.…”
Section: Tenure Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Previous research on faculty status and academic librarianship has tended to focus on tenure and promotion policies and practices. 4 Library faculty are often evaluated for promotion and tenure in similar categories to traditional teaching faculty, namely research, service, and job performance. In some cases, faculty librarians are governed by tenure and promotion policies that are identical to teaching faculty, who are normally evaluated in the categories of teaching, research, and service.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%