2005
DOI: 10.1080/08039410.2005.9666322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tenure Reform in South Africa: Titling versus Social Embeddedness

Abstract: Ben CousinsThis article describes the key features of African land tenure systems, with particular Professor, emphasis on their social and political embeddedness, and the origin of rights in entitlements flowing from group membership rather than from an allocation by authorities. University of WesternIt reviews experience of tenure reform in other parts of Africa, and then analyses the Cape's School of potential impacts of the Communal Land Rights Act of 2004, recently promulgated in Government South Africa. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He also states that land certificates can serve as evidence to protect farmers' rights to their land in court cases. However, De Soto's works were criticised for what some claim is the failure to (i) acknowledge the informal land market in which farmers access land through a variety of exchange mechanisms (Cousins, ), (ii) recognise that formalisation of land titles might also lead to insecurity, for instance, by reinforcing existing inequality within the community, (iii) explain how land titles can be important for improved access to credit facilities such as under conditions of poor access to credit and (iv) recognise that title registration might not contribute to productivity, for instance, in sub‐Saharan Africa, where the importance of securing customary land tenure has more acceptance than formal land titles by the rural communities (Musembi, ; Bromley, ; Otto, ; Rahmato, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He also states that land certificates can serve as evidence to protect farmers' rights to their land in court cases. However, De Soto's works were criticised for what some claim is the failure to (i) acknowledge the informal land market in which farmers access land through a variety of exchange mechanisms (Cousins, ), (ii) recognise that formalisation of land titles might also lead to insecurity, for instance, by reinforcing existing inequality within the community, (iii) explain how land titles can be important for improved access to credit facilities such as under conditions of poor access to credit and (iv) recognise that title registration might not contribute to productivity, for instance, in sub‐Saharan Africa, where the importance of securing customary land tenure has more acceptance than formal land titles by the rural communities (Musembi, ; Bromley, ; Otto, ; Rahmato, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although de Soto's ideas have been most fully adopted in the cities of his native Peru, he has also been active in sub-Saharan Africa, giving new life to debates about the titling of agrarian land in the continent. As a result, the current literature on formalization is dominated by Africanist scholars writing primarily from a rural perspective (Cousins 2005(Cousins , 2007Meinzen-Dick & Mwangi 2009;Sjaastad & Cousins 2009). De Soto's Africanist critics challenge his arguments as a misguided imposition of Western norms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Soto's Africanist critics challenge his arguments as a misguided imposition of Western norms. Their position is summarized in the phrase ''titling versus social embeddedness'' (Cousins 2005). The dualism points to the polarization of debate that has opposed customary group rights to individual private rights.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of them, together and separately, have been prolific in terms of their academic and policy publications setting out their extensive criticisms of CLARA (Claassens & Cousins 2008;Cousins 2005aCousins , 2005bCousins , 2007Cousins & Claassens 2004, 2006.…”
Section: T R a D I T I O N A L L E A D E R S A N D T H E A N C: P O Lmentioning
confidence: 98%