2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2014.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teorías y estilos de debriefing: el método con buen juicio como herramienta de evaluación formativa en salud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
22

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Mariani et al (28) Mixed method quasi-experimental study with structured debriefing Structured debriefing Lead authors: Fanning et al (35) and Phrampus et al (36) Maestre and Rudolph (32) Descriptive study, with a qualitative approach, on the principles of debriefing with good judgment…”
Section: Authors Outline Debriefing Methods and Lead Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mariani et al (28) Mixed method quasi-experimental study with structured debriefing Structured debriefing Lead authors: Fanning et al (35) and Phrampus et al (36) Maestre and Rudolph (32) Descriptive study, with a qualitative approach, on the principles of debriefing with good judgment…”
Section: Authors Outline Debriefing Methods and Lead Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debriefing with good judgment Lead author: Maestre et al (32) Dreifuerst (33) Quasi-experimental study, with pre-test and post-test application to investigate the development of clinical reasoning in students through debriefing…”
Section: Authors Outline Debriefing Methods and Lead Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Es un espacio de reflexión e identificación del impacto de la experiencia, cuyo objetivo es analizar, dar sentido y aprender de una experiencia vivida. Esta actividad ayuda a los estudiantes a comprender, analizar y sintetizar los principales conceptos técnicos con el objetivo de mejorar su rendimiento en futuras situaciones clínicas simuladas, como también aprender y desarrollar actividades como la autoevaluación, aprendizaje reflexivo y significativo, aprender de errores, liderazgo, reforzar buenas prácticas, trabajo en equipo, asignación de roles, tareas, la gestión de crisis y la creación de nuevas metas de aprendizaje individuales y grupales entre otros aspectos (11,22) .…”
Section: B Retroalimentaciónunclassified
“…Higher level evaluation even measures the impact the learner exposed to simulation makes on patient oriented outcomes. While significant attention in recent years has focused on the use of debriefing to promote reflection, structured approaches are advocated, like Delta Plus [10], PEARL [10], and Advocacy/Inquiry method [11]. Such structured approaches may be limiting in what can be revealed about simulation design features that impact participant decision-making and problem-solving processes.…”
Section: Commentary On a Participatory Inquiry Paradigm To Assess Parmentioning
confidence: 99%