1987
DOI: 10.1002/star.19870390807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tepary Bean Starch Part III: In vitro Digestibility

Abstract: In vitro digestibility of starch from tepary bean, Phaseolus acutifolius var. latifolius. was determined in comparison with tepary bean flour and maize starch. The extent of sample hydrolysis by a-amylase was measured as mg reducing sugar (maltose) released per 100 mg substrate. After 2 h incubation at 37"C, values obtained for tepary starch. tepary flour and maize starch treated in various ways were as follows: raw 8.0.8.6 and 25.6; freeze dried 2.6,3.2 and 17.8; autoclaved 7.4,5.7 and 27.7; cooked (15 min) 8… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for severe reduction in mean RS content of tepary bean could be attributed to the incubation step (at 50 o C overnight) during starch extraction procedure followed for cultivars with colored seed coat. It was supported by previous observations (Abbas et al, 1987) as the RS content decreases at increased temperatures during processing (> 37 o C). Tepary starch was sensitive to temperature which explains the relatively low amylose/amylopectin values in tepary and high content of hydrolysable starch (Tables 2, 3).…”
Section: Variability Among Cropssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason for severe reduction in mean RS content of tepary bean could be attributed to the incubation step (at 50 o C overnight) during starch extraction procedure followed for cultivars with colored seed coat. It was supported by previous observations (Abbas et al, 1987) as the RS content decreases at increased temperatures during processing (> 37 o C). Tepary starch was sensitive to temperature which explains the relatively low amylose/amylopectin values in tepary and high content of hydrolysable starch (Tables 2, 3).…”
Section: Variability Among Cropssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The present observations of reduced values of RS were supported by similar observation in teparybean (Abbas et al, 1987) and were due to differences in granule structure, crystallinity and amylose content and due to increased enzyme availability.…”
Section: Tepary Beansupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The raw tepary starch was more resistant to hydrolysis (by α-amylase) than maize starch due to differences in granules structure and amylose content [12]. The starch from cooked tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starch from cooked tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray) was more hydrolyzed compared to its raw starch [12]. Therefore, based on the dependence of variable "resistant starch" on genotype and temperature, we planned to perform RS analysis of the ground pigeonpea seed powders of four cultivars from two planting times during third and second week of May and June, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%