1988
DOI: 10.1002/tera.1420380509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teratological assessment of exposure to time‐varying magnetic field

Abstract: A teratological assessment was performed using rats that were exposed to an alternating magnetic field. The magnetic field had a sawtooth waveform similar to that produced by video display terminals (VDTs). Female rats were exposed 2 weeks prior to and throughout pregnancy at a rate of 7 h/day. Three intensities of magnetic field (5.7, 23 or 66 microT) were used. All of these field intensities were much greater than those to which VDT users are exposed. A slight but statistically significant decrease in matern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation was supported by the findings that MF exposure did not induce fetal ossification delay, an indication of intrauterine growth retardation, at any exposure level tested and did not cause a decrease in the body weight of male fetuses. In the developmental toxicity study of MF in rats, Stuchly et al [1988] observed a decrease in maternal lymphocyte count in the 66 mT (660 mG) exposure group, but it was within the normal range. Ryan et al [1996] found a reduction in body weight in both sexes of fetuses in the 0.2 mT (2 G) exposure group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This interpretation was supported by the findings that MF exposure did not induce fetal ossification delay, an indication of intrauterine growth retardation, at any exposure level tested and did not cause a decrease in the body weight of male fetuses. In the developmental toxicity study of MF in rats, Stuchly et al [1988] observed a decrease in maternal lymphocyte count in the 66 mT (660 mG) exposure group, but it was within the normal range. Ryan et al [1996] found a reduction in body weight in both sexes of fetuses in the 0.2 mT (2 G) exposure group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In one study (38), exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields seemed to increase the number of resorptions, while slightly increased frequencies of malformations (36) or minor skeletal anomalies (39,40) were observed in other studies (table 2). Furthermore, no significant effects were found in some studies in spite of a large study sample (41,42).…”
Section: Studies On Mammalsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A significa nt increase of minor skeletal anomalies in the highest exposure group (66 u'T) was observed when pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 18-kHz magnetic fields with a triangular waveform (39). The number of malformations and resorptions was low and not related to magnetic field exposure.…”
Section: Studies On Mammalsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Henminki and colleagues (18) (19,20,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)35,36) and congenital malforiations (23,24,2627,29-33) and given less attention to other speific adverse reproductive outcomes (20,21,(26)(27)(28)32,33 (63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69). In studies where effects have been reported, the observed developmental deficits indude various congenital anomalies, developmental delay, altered sex ratio, fetal loss, reduced fertility, and demasculinization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%