2023
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terminally Phosphorylated Triblock Polyethers Acting Both as Templates and Pore-Forming Agents for Surface Molecular Imprinting of Monoliths Targeting Phosphopeptides

Abstract: The novel process reported here described the manufacture of monolithic molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) using a terminally functionalized block copolymer as the imprinting template and pore-forming agent. The MIPs were prepared through a step-growth polymerization process using a melamine–formaldehyde precondensate in a biphasic solvent system. Despite having a relatively low imprinting factor, the use of MIP monolith in liquid chromatography demonstrated the ability to selectively target desired analyte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…90 The domain sizes varied inversely with the polymerization temperatures: 5.0 ± 0.39, 4.1 ± 0.54, and 2.4 ± 0.33 μm for 4, 40, and 80 °C, respectively (Figure 1b−d). However, only the sample polymerized at 80 °C formed a space-filling monolith as in our previous work, 66 whereas the other nonfreezing conditions (4 and 40 °C) led to monolithic materials that did no fill the glass vial molds entirely but underwent syneresis with ≈20 vol % expelled liquid. Despite the expected imprinting enhancement at low temperatures, it must also be noted that the rates and yields of the polymerizations and also the structures were affected by temperature in these three nonfrozen polymerization attempts.…”
Section: Effect Of Polymerization Temperature and Time On The Cross-l...mentioning
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…90 The domain sizes varied inversely with the polymerization temperatures: 5.0 ± 0.39, 4.1 ± 0.54, and 2.4 ± 0.33 μm for 4, 40, and 80 °C, respectively (Figure 1b−d). However, only the sample polymerized at 80 °C formed a space-filling monolith as in our previous work, 66 whereas the other nonfreezing conditions (4 and 40 °C) led to monolithic materials that did no fill the glass vial molds entirely but underwent syneresis with ≈20 vol % expelled liquid. Despite the expected imprinting enhancement at low temperatures, it must also be noted that the rates and yields of the polymerizations and also the structures were affected by temperature in these three nonfrozen polymerization attempts.…”
Section: Effect Of Polymerization Temperature and Time On The Cross-l...mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Cross-linked melamine, utilized as a hydrophilic scaffold for MIPs, was prepared by step-growth polymerization of melamine and paraformaldehyde in a tertiary porogen mixture adapted from our previous communication, with some modification as described in the experimental section. Polycondensation between melamine and formaldehyde occurs in the presence of H + or OH – as catalyst and is promoted by temperature. , However, increasing temperature weakens the interactions between the template and the growing polymer due to the temperature-dependent strengths of hydrogen bonds and permanent dipole-permanent dipole interactions (Keesom forces), which are essential for molecular imprinting of polar templates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations