1984
DOI: 10.1097/00005110-198406000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Termination of a Successful Internship Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the novice nurse cohort at the 3rd month after being employed was assumed to be the baseline and the rate of turnover was confirmed in each period of December 2003, June 2004, and March 2005. As a result, the turnover ratio in the 2 years was 12.7%, which was less than the turnover rate in 1 year in the USA: 24% (Marcum, 2004), 30% (Monarch, 1994), 66% (Rufo, 1987), and 70% (Squires, 2002). When we consider the factors for turnover, the factors such as “no support from peers” and being “dissatisfied with the workplace” strongly affect the turnover of novice nurses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this study, the novice nurse cohort at the 3rd month after being employed was assumed to be the baseline and the rate of turnover was confirmed in each period of December 2003, June 2004, and March 2005. As a result, the turnover ratio in the 2 years was 12.7%, which was less than the turnover rate in 1 year in the USA: 24% (Marcum, 2004), 30% (Monarch, 1994), 66% (Rufo, 1987), and 70% (Squires, 2002). When we consider the factors for turnover, the factors such as “no support from peers” and being “dissatisfied with the workplace” strongly affect the turnover of novice nurses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Studies not previously discussed in this review of the literature on transition programs but which also speak to this outcome variable were related by Holloran, Mishkin & Hanson (1980), Hollefreund, Mooney, Moore &Jersan (1981) andRufo (1984). It should be noted that in each case, the authors provide insufficient information by which to assess the rigor of their study design nor the validity and reliability of their findings.…”
Section: Edmundsmentioning
confidence: 84%