1990
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-53162-9_50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Termination proofs by multiset path orderings imply primitive recursive derivation lengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weiermann has shown in [Wei93] Cichon's claim which states that each finite rewrite system whose termination is proved by a lexicographic path ordering induced by an order over a finite signature yields a subrecursive (multiple recursive) function on the depth of terms which bound the lengths of derivations of terms. A similar and earlier result was achieved by Hofbauer in [Hof92]. These bounding functions are defined recursively in the extended Grzegorczyk-hierarchy; we refer the reader to [Ros84] for a study on subrecursive hierarchies.…”
Section: Strong Normalization Proofs By Natural Interpretationssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Weiermann has shown in [Wei93] Cichon's claim which states that each finite rewrite system whose termination is proved by a lexicographic path ordering induced by an order over a finite signature yields a subrecursive (multiple recursive) function on the depth of terms which bound the lengths of derivations of terms. A similar and earlier result was achieved by Hofbauer in [Hof92]. These bounding functions are defined recursively in the extended Grzegorczyk-hierarchy; we refer the reader to [Ros84] for a study on subrecursive hierarchies.…”
Section: Strong Normalization Proofs By Natural Interpretationssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Lemma 4.14 ( [Hof92]). Given a finite rewrite system R on a finite signature F and an interpretation I of elements of F such that the interpretation I prove termination of R. Given Φ : N −→ N a strictly monotonic function such that for each f ∈ F and for every k ∈ N the inequality I(f )(k, .…”
Section: Strong Normalization Proofs By Natural Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in our notion of !-termination there is no restriction on the kind of monotone functions allowed. Hofbauer (1992) proved that any TRS which can be proven terminating by a recursive path order, is !-terminating. By giving restrictions on the kind of functions allowed, a more detailed hierarchy between polynomial termination and !termination can be given.…”
Section: Hencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…x + (s(s(y)) + z) s(x) + (y + (z + w)) ! x + (z + (y + w)) from Hofbauer and Lautemann (1989). The termination proof can be given via the typing s : s 1 !…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both (i) and (ii) were stated in Cichon [7] together with Girard's Hierarchy Comparison Theorem. Afterwards (i) has been verified by Hofbauer [10] and (ii) by Weiermann [11]. Furthermore, MPO and LPO are complete, i. e., a finite rewrite system for each primitive recursive function is reducing under MPO, and a finite rewrite system for each multiply recursive function is reducing under LPO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%