“…In the former case, only a single undisturbed Mu component is seen, with an intercept at 0.5 and an inflection point at B1600 G, as expected, while at the fastest formation rates only the MuC 6 H 6 radical is seen, formed essentially instantaneously, with an inflection point at the radical hyperfine field of 185 G. The Quantum simulations for the solution data, exhibiting two components, show, as X -0, an intercept that falls below that for the pure radical, arising from the sequential formation of the radical from Mu, the muon having lost half its polarization due to charge exchange in forming Mu, 22,30,36,42 and then expected to lose half again in the radical, due to fast electron spin exchange, which again leads to depolarization of the muon spin. 40,47,48 That the solution data (dashed green line) is above the simulated curve at low fields, while that for the pure benzene (dashed blue line) falls below, reflects the difficulty of analyzing these data sets. In particular, a reliable calibration of the asymmetry response of the spectrometer over the full LF range of the measurement is difficult to obtain, which impacts in turn on the accuracy with which the diamagnetic component can be removed, a problem that is exacerbated at low fields due to nuclear dipolar couplings.…”