Terms of engagement: Facebook and Twitter use among nonprofit human service organizations

Abstract

This study uses hierarchy of engagement to analyze how nonprofit human service organizations use Facebook and Twitter to engage stakeholders. Their framework has not been applied to this nonprofit subgroup, and most previous scholarship on this topic focuses on just one platform. We also contribute by drawing on organizational theory to better understand variation in the modes of engagement organizations emphasize. Based on our analysis, we add new subcategories to the hierarchy of engagement. In addition, we find that compared to other nonprofit subgroups examined in previous research, the organizations in our sample placed a greater emphasis on using social media messages to ask stakeholders to take action. We report only modest variations in how organizations were using Facebook and Twitter. Finally, according to our results, resource dependence and stewardship theories help explain the modes of engagement organizations prioritize. K E Y W O R D SSocial media, Stakeholder engagement, Nonprofit < management,

Liked on Facebook, liked for real?: Nonprofits' online popularity and financial performance

“…However, it cannot be ruled out that this relationship is due to the unique characteristics of arts organizations. The nonprofit sector consists of diverse organizations that vary greatly in terms of clients, services, and products, and different nonprofit subgroups engage stakeholders in distinctive ways (Campbell & Lambright, 2020). Compared with other nonprofit organizations, missions of arts organizations tend to focus rather exclusively on aesthetic purposes, and the services provided by arts organizations are characterized by excludable benefits (Kushner & King, 1994).…”

Evaluating Non-profit Intraorganizational Twitter Use of UNICEF and MSF

“…Numerous studies follow the hierarchy of engagement theoretical framework to define Tweet content. This framework classifies Twitter content as either sharing information, building community, or soliciting action, while another study has developed sub-categories of these functions to provide a deeper analysis of functional communications on Twitter Campbell & Lambright, 2020). According to , non-profit communications on Twitter can be categorized into three functions, including sharing information, building community through interactivity, and providing a call to action.…”

“…According to , non-profit communications on Twitter can be categorized into three functions, including sharing information, building community through interactivity, and providing a call to action. These three functions are part of Lovejoy and Saxton's hierarchy of engagement, which is a theoretical framework that identifies ways that social media messages engage with stakeholders (Campbell & Lambright, 2020).…”

An Approach to Exploring Non-Governmental Development Organizations Interest Groups on Facebook

“…They argued that using strategies on posts related to the stewardship concept, such as accountability, information, reciprocity, and relationship building, could influence the success or failure of communication. Other studies that have contributed, drawing on organizational theory to achieve a better understanding of the forms of engagement that organizations emphasize, are the studies by Saxton and Waters, Cambell et al, and Ji et al [31,49,50]. Despite the importance of NGDOs' stakeholder relationships in the digital domain, insufficient scientific evidence has been found on these relationships' behavioral patterns.…”