2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ternary Ni2(1-x)Mo2xP nanowire arrays toward efficient and stable hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis under large-current-density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
162
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our MoS 2 / Ni 3 S 2 NW-NF has a Tafel slope of 58.9 mV dec -1 , indicating that the HER process follows the Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism, where the electrochemical desorption of hydrogen is the ratedetermining step. This value is also lower than many NF-based catalysts, like MoS 2 /Ni 3 S 2 [21][22][23], Ni 3 S 2 [31], Ni 2 P-Ni 3 S 2 [32] and Ni@Co-Ni-P [33], except for Ni 2(1-x) Mo 2x P [27] and FeP/Ni 2 P [28] ( Fig. 3c and Table S1 (online)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our MoS 2 / Ni 3 S 2 NW-NF has a Tafel slope of 58.9 mV dec -1 , indicating that the HER process follows the Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism, where the electrochemical desorption of hydrogen is the ratedetermining step. This value is also lower than many NF-based catalysts, like MoS 2 /Ni 3 S 2 [21][22][23], Ni 3 S 2 [31], Ni 2 P-Ni 3 S 2 [32] and Ni@Co-Ni-P [33], except for Ni 2(1-x) Mo 2x P [27] and FeP/Ni 2 P [28] ( Fig. 3c and Table S1 (online)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This comparison indicates that the electrochemical active materials in our catalyst are dominantly coaxial MoS 2 / Ni 3 S 2 NWs. Note that these values are much smaller than those of the reported MoS 2 /Ni 3 S 2 -NF materials (187 and 274, 110 and 200, 98 and 191 mV) [21][22][23] and many other NF-based catalysts (Table S1 online), including Ni 3 S 2 (135 and 225 mV) [31], Ni 2 P-Ni 3 S 2 heteronanoflake arrays (80 and~160 mV) [32] and Ni 2(1-x) Mo 2x P (72 and 162 mV) [27]. Moreover, the overpotential for current density of 100 mA cm À2 is close to that of Pt/C-NF (110 mV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier investigations have considered HER activity in acidic medium over Ni 2 P catalysts, whereby the Volmer-Tafel mechanism (H + (aq) → H * , 2H * → ↑H 2 ) involves only characterizing the Gibb's free energy hydrogen adsorption to the catalyst surface [22,23]. There exist limited studies of the HER activity of Ni 2 P under alkaline conditions and the underlying mechanism is still poorly understood [37,38]. The mechanism of the HER in alkaline media is slightly different to acidic media and can typically be treated as a combination of three elementary steps: the Volmer step-water dissociation and formation of a reactive intermediate (H 2 O + e − + cat → H*-cat + OH − )-followed by either the Heyrovsky step (H*-cat + H 2 O + e-→ cat + OH − + ↑H 2 ) or the Tafel recombination step (2H*-cat → ↑H 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 91 ] The DFT result suggested that CoN x @GDY had a relatively small H 2 O activation energy (Δ G 1, 0.45 eV), which was much smaller than that of benchmarked electrocatalysts such as Ni 2 P (1.16 eV) and NiMoP (0.84 eV) ( Figure 9 a,c). [ 140 ] It also possessed a small H adsorption energy of 0.05 eV, which was similar with Pt catalyst. All of these results suggested that CoN x @GDY catalyzed HER proceeded an energy‐favorable Volmer–Heyrovsky pathway, further revealing its high catalytic activity.…”
Section: Gdy Supported Electrocatalysts For Energy Conversionmentioning
confidence: 93%