1972
DOI: 10.2307/1795497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terrain Evaluation by Means of a Data Bank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The whole may be regarded as a system in which the classification (i) consists of a set of files, one for each class, and the data from (ii) are the contents of the files. Beckett et al (1972) built just such a physical bank for engineering data on soil, and they demonstrated it in action for terrain evaluation.…”
Section: Geographic Information Systems (Gis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The whole may be regarded as a system in which the classification (i) consists of a set of files, one for each class, and the data from (ii) are the contents of the files. Beckett et al (1972) built just such a physical bank for engineering data on soil, and they demonstrated it in action for terrain evaluation.…”
Section: Geographic Information Systems (Gis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terrain evaluation assesses land features such as topography, geology, soil quality, water availability, vegetation, and current land usage to determine its appropriateness for a specific activity (Beckett et al 1972). Land evaluation analyses the essential properties of the terrain and its ability to support specific land uses sustainably over extended periods (Bandyopadhyay et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of soil variation presented in McBratney and Webster (1981) using techniques of data transformation, principal component analysis, and computation of the sample variogram required a personal computer and about 0.1 MB of computer storage. While quite unremarkable for the present-day soil scientist, the use of digital computer technologies in 1981 was already a long way from other tools such as punched cards, a pre-electronic digital data storing and handling tool widely used by soil scientists (e.g., by Beckett et al, 1972). A few years before the study of McBratney and Webster (1981), the punched cards were themselves an improvement in comparison with analog data such as aerial photographs used for soil and land evaluation by Buringh (1954) or Webster and Beckett (1970), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%