2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574711000798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terramechanics-based wheel–terrain interaction model and its applications to off-road wheeled mobile robots

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper presents a wheel–terrain interaction model, which enables efficient modeling of wheeled locomotion in soft soil and numerical simulations of off-road mobile robots. This modular model is derived based on wheel kinematics and terramechanics and the main focus is on describing the stress distributions along the wheel–terrain interface and the reaction forces exerted on the wheel by the soil. When the wheels are steered, the shear stresses underneath the wheel were modeled based on isotropic ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Table 1 presents the results for the sinkage in CE-3, Luna 17 and Apollo 15 landing sites, using k = 861 kPa/m n and n = 1, as given by the Bekker pressure-sinkage model for FJS lunar simulant [33]. Notice even values are very close to the actual ones detected through image processing by [10], Apollo's LRV sinkage is overestimated due to the large D/b ratio.…”
Section: Comparing Visual Sinkage Observations With Empirical Estimatmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…1. Table 1 presents the results for the sinkage in CE-3, Luna 17 and Apollo 15 landing sites, using k = 861 kPa/m n and n = 1, as given by the Bekker pressure-sinkage model for FJS lunar simulant [33]. Notice even values are very close to the actual ones detected through image processing by [10], Apollo's LRV sinkage is overestimated due to the large D/b ratio.…”
Section: Comparing Visual Sinkage Observations With Empirical Estimatmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The bulldozing forces are not needed for the torus-shaped wheels in contrast with the cylindrical-shaped wheels. 14,15 However, two extra coordinate transformations need to be included in the integrals when the terrain reaction forces are computed for torus-shaped wheels. This section focuses on the WTIM for an individual wheel.…”
Section: Terramechanics Model For Wheel-terrain Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of these angles is based on ref. [14], as listed in Appendix A. An arbitrary point P on the torus surface can be expressed by the position vector r p from the wheel hub center 16 as…”
Section: Torus Geometry and Sinkage Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ishigami et al [9] incorporated this 2-D wheel-soil model into a multibody frame and generated a framework of vehiclewheel-terrain dynamics. Jia et al [10] rebuilt the model with an assumption of isotropic shear stress and took grousers into account. Iizuka et al [11], [12] noticed that the surface is probably rough and studied the influence of circular and pentagon wheels to the performance of a lunar rover running on a slope.…”
Section: Error-tolerant Switched Robust Extended Kalmanmentioning
confidence: 99%