2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2015.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terrorism and its impact on the cost of debt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They prove that terrorist attacks have a very negative effect on the stock markets. Procasky and Ujah (2016) study the long‐term effects of terrorist attacks on debt markets. They find that terrorist attacks have different long‐term effects on developing and developed countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They prove that terrorist attacks have a very negative effect on the stock markets. Procasky and Ujah (2016) study the long‐term effects of terrorist attacks on debt markets. They find that terrorist attacks have different long‐term effects on developing and developed countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research theme is a subject of great concern for investors. As a result, the literature on whether terrorism can increase or decrease the public debt/gross domestic product (GDP) ratio has been the subject of much publicity in recent years (Procasky & Ujah, 2016). In order to determine this relationship between public debt, terrorism, and the informal economy in these countries, we use the three indicators of terrorism—namely, national, transnational and uncertain—for the 47 African countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risks are integrated into financial flows as the cost of equity and/or cost of debt. Conflict increases downside risks; therefore, projects in fragile areas are induced to higher costs of capital [68,69]. These values affect, in turn, the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) [66].…”
Section: Risk-adjusted Discount Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political riskexpropriation risk, transfer risk, and violence riskreduces investor confidence in economies and governments (Archer et al 2007;Jensen et al 2008;Bechtel 2009;Biglaiser et al 2008;Jensen 2003;Jensen 2008;Bernhard et al 2006;Jensen et al 2005;Busse et al 2007). Governments facing armed conflict thus often find their foreign investment flows curtailed (Li et al 2010;Busse et al 2007), sovereign credit ratings downgraded (Brewer et al 1990;Procasky et al 2016;Chen et al 2004;Castañeda et al 2012), and corporate risk insurance premiums raised (Jensen et al 2008).…”
Section: The Supply-side Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%