2008
DOI: 10.3233/nre-2008-23503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test accommodations for the geriatric patient

Abstract: Obtaining accurate information about the neuropsychological functioning of elderly individuals with physical or sensorimotor limitations may be fostered by judicious use of nonstandard testing strategies. We review professional documents that support this position and discuss selected "flexible" testing techniques that can serve this goal. These approaches may permit assessment of skills that might otherwise go unmeasured (e.g., naming ability or executive function in persons with visual impairment). This pers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In assessment sessions, accommodations may be required such as the use of specialized tests or modifications/adaptations to existing tests depending on the population. In these instances, caution should be used regarding the selection and use of appropriate norms given differences from the original normative sample (Caplan & Shechter, 2008; DeLuca, 2005; Hill-Briggs et al, 2007; Magasi et al, 2017; Morgan, 2005). For example, data from the original “Mayo’s Older American Normative Studies” (MOANS; Ivnik et al, 1992) was specifically based on an older sample aged 56–97 and has since been revised a number of times (i.e., see Steinberg & Bieliauskas, 2005) resulting in a variety of clinical and research-based normative data sets.…”
Section: Practice Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In assessment sessions, accommodations may be required such as the use of specialized tests or modifications/adaptations to existing tests depending on the population. In these instances, caution should be used regarding the selection and use of appropriate norms given differences from the original normative sample (Caplan & Shechter, 2008; DeLuca, 2005; Hill-Briggs et al, 2007; Magasi et al, 2017; Morgan, 2005). For example, data from the original “Mayo’s Older American Normative Studies” (MOANS; Ivnik et al, 1992) was specifically based on an older sample aged 56–97 and has since been revised a number of times (i.e., see Steinberg & Bieliauskas, 2005) resulting in a variety of clinical and research-based normative data sets.…”
Section: Practice Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%