1992
DOI: 10.1016/0964-8305(92)90014-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test assemblies for monitoring decay in wood exposed above ground

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an existing disadvantage of the current E25 decking specimens. Other methods that use stacks or layers of somewhat smaller specimens that serve to trap moisture while still allowing disassembly for internal inspection may warrant further consideration (De Groot 1992, Jenkins 2012, Meyer and others 2016. The E27 accelerated lap-joint method does use two layers, but it appears that larger pieces and/or additional layers are needed to enhance moisture trapping.…”
Section: Observed Specimen Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an existing disadvantage of the current E25 decking specimens. Other methods that use stacks or layers of somewhat smaller specimens that serve to trap moisture while still allowing disassembly for internal inspection may warrant further consideration (De Groot 1992, Jenkins 2012, Meyer and others 2016. The E27 accelerated lap-joint method does use two layers, but it appears that larger pieces and/or additional layers are needed to enhance moisture trapping.…”
Section: Observed Specimen Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above-ground tests are useful for evaluating the natural durability of building components intended for applications protected from the environment (Clausen and Lindner 2011;Clausen and others 2006;Eslyn and others 1985;Highley 1995;Räberg and others 2005). A number of standardized and alternative test designs have been evaluated; e.g., post-rail, cross braces, Y-joints, simulated deck test, L-joints, and lap joints (DeGroot 1992;Hedley and others 1995;Morrell and others 1998;Morris and McFarling 2007), with L-and lap-joints most commonly used. One alternative test assembly, the simulated deck test, addresses the need for accelerated test methods to speed up the otherwise lengthy period of time necessary to acquire sufficient performance data for new preservatives (Williams and others 1995;Morris and McFarling 2007).…”
Section: Objective and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that these elevated moisture contents facilitate decay growth, as damages on existing structures are predominantly found in such areas (see Robbers et al 2018). Also, standardized specimens used for accelerated decay testing in above-ground conditions are, in general, designed as joints to facilitate decay growth (Groot 1992;Meyer et al 2016). Several research studies have investigated the moisture conditions in joints through continuous moisture monitoring (see Gaby and Duff 1978;Isaksson and Thelandersson 2013;Fredriksson et al 2016;Niklewski et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%