2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-3664(99)00227-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test generation based on control and data dependencies within system specifications in SDL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
51
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…States can be supplemented by more precise observations, such as control flow (Ural, et al, 2000) or observations on internal variable values (Petrenko, et al, 2004). However, in the envisaged agile testing context, it is not really tractable to accommodate more complex multi-level specification and testing for each class, since there is already some resistance to adopting simple state-based specifications.…”
Section: Testing With Partial Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…States can be supplemented by more precise observations, such as control flow (Ural, et al, 2000) or observations on internal variable values (Petrenko, et al, 2004). However, in the envisaged agile testing context, it is not really tractable to accommodate more complex multi-level specification and testing for each class, since there is already some resistance to adopting simple state-based specifications.…”
Section: Testing With Partial Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFSMs can model both control and data and a number of standard modelling languages such as Statecharts and SDL can be seen as EFSMs. EFSM based test techniques can be applied to models in such languages [7,8] as well as formalisms such as (UML) Use Cases and Z and in domains such as communication protocols and web services [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em geral, são utilizados conceitos tradicionalmente empregados em nível de unidade para o teste de programas, avaliando-se a adequação desses conceitos no contexto de teste de especificações (Black et al, 2000a; Chung e Sidhu, 1991; Fabbri et al, 1994c Fabbri et al, , 1995bPetrenko et al, 1996; Probert e Guo, 1991; Souza et al, 2000a,c;Ural et al, 2000; Ural e Yang, 1991; Wang e Liu, 1993).…”
Section: Considerações Iniciaisunclassified