2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/etfa.2016.7733624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test methodology for virtual commissioning based on behaviour simulation of production systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 1 The basic configuration of virtual commissioning [24] In terms of the logic signals processed, the digital twin can be divided in terms of the size of the simulated objects. In the case of the manufacturing systems design domain, the two main objects are the manufacturing machine and the manufacturing system.…”
Section: Development and Methods Of Virtual Commissioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1 The basic configuration of virtual commissioning [24] In terms of the logic signals processed, the digital twin can be divided in terms of the size of the simulated objects. In the case of the manufacturing systems design domain, the two main objects are the manufacturing machine and the manufacturing system.…”
Section: Development and Methods Of Virtual Commissioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of this approach in VC is that it can detect collisions undetected with conventional simulation technologies. Also using VC, [15] applied it both in the first commissioning of the engineering stage and after product changes in the production stage. This approach defines behavior models to describe the behaviors of each resource in the manufacturing system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barth et al mention that VC makes it possible to test major incidents such as cable breaks or sensor failures but do not provide specific solutions [17]. Süß et al test the movement performance of a robot and check interference among different mechanical structures with an accurate error-free virtual model, also without considering errors in VC [23]. Schneider et al verify the system with regard to application scenarios as well as unexpected behavior in case of failure [24].…”
Section: General Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%