Test of 6-inch-thick pressure vessels. Series 2. Intermediate test vessels V-3, V-4, and V-6

Bryan, R.H.; Merkle, J.G.; Raftenberg, Martin N.; Robinson, G.C.; Smith, J. E.

doi:10.2172/4120906

Cited by 16 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In V-7B [2] the sharpened tip of the prepared flaw was placed in the heat-affected zone of the repair weld. This hydraulic test was an attempted replication of the two earlier tests of this vessel, and it resulted in a leak at about the same pressures attained previously.…”

Section: ===mentioning

confidence: 99%

Test of Thick Vessel with a Flaw in Residual Stress Field

Bryan

Holz

Iskander³

et al. 1981

Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intermediate test vessel V-8, a 152-mm-thick vessel fabricated of SA533, grade B, class 1 steel, was pressurized to failure at -23°C. The vessel contained a fatigue-sharpened notch adjacent to a half-bead weld repair that had not been stress relieved. Residual stresses and fracture toughnesses were determined before the pressure test by measurements on a prototypical weld, and fracture predictions were made by linear elastic fracture analysis. Predictions agreed well with test results, demonstrating the important influence of high residual stresses on fracture behavior.

show abstract

Section: ===mentioning

confidence: 99%

Test of Thick Vessel with a Flaw in Residual Stress Field

Bryan

Holz

Iskander³

et al. 1981

Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Using the value of C= 1.19 obtained by Newman's method, the pseudoelastic failure pressure for model V7E-A3 was estimated from the equation23 , for d = 0.85. gives Pf = 490 MPa (71.1 ksi). The corresponding estimate of failure strain for an LEFM analysis based on strain23 is given by where M p = 1321 MPa-T' (|9| 5 ksi-T') for (he intermediate test vessels. The resulting estimate of failure strain is 0.371^.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Test of 6-in. -thick pressure vessels. Series 3: intermediate test vessel V-7. [PWR and BWR]

Bryan¹,

Canonico²,

Holz³

et al. 1976

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

1. INTRODUCTION 1 REFERENCES ? 2. DESCRIPTION OF VESSELS 4 DESIGN AND PROCUREMENT 4 MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION In Traulr and Clurpt V-Nokh Impxi Doij 10 Fractur? T^wyhncs* 14 REFERENCES I: 3. FLAW PREPARATION I" INSTRUMENTATION 33 TEST PROC EDURES »* Vevrl Preparation. . ^^ Piruurc Testing 37 Ultrasonic Moniiurine 37 TEST RESULTS »«• REFERFNf ES <0 5. FRACTURE ANALYSIS METHODS AND RESULTS 51 BACKGROUND 51 MODEL TESTS FOR Ft AW SIZt SELECTION 55

show abstract

Safety and Risk of Light Water Reactors and their Fuel Cycle Facilities

Keßler¹

2012

Sustainable and Safe Nuclear Fission Energy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Test of 6-inch-thick pressure vessels. Series 2. Intermediate test vessels V-3, V-4, and V-6

Cited by 16 publications

References 2 publications

Test of Thick Vessel with a Flaw in Residual Stress Field

Test of Thick Vessel with a Flaw in Residual Stress Field

Test of 6-in. -thick pressure vessels. Series 3: intermediate test vessel V-7. [PWR and BWR]

Safety and Risk of Light Water Reactors and their Fuel Cycle Facilities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About