“…For another 13 instruments, it was not possible access the full questionnaire; therefore, we could not assess the single items used within the questionnaires, and hence, the elements of psychosocial fundamentals of care under investigation were not clear to the reader (Caring Behaviors Inventory (CBI): Aupia, Lee, Liu, Wu, & Mills, 2018; He et al, 2013; Papastavrou et al, 2012a; Papastavrou et al, 2012b; Patient Needs Assessment in Palliative Care (PNAP): Buzgova, Kozakova, Sikorova, Zelenikova, & Jarosova, 2016; questionnaire used by Comiskey et al, 2014; questionnaire used by Ehrlander, Ali, & Chretien, 2009; Revised Humane Caring Scale (RHCS): Goh, Ang, Chan, He, & Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2016; questionnaire used by Göransson & Von Rosen, 2010; questionnaire used by Raee, Abedi, & Shahriari, 2017; Consumer Quality index (CQ‐index): Teunissen, Rotink, & Lagro‐Janssen, 2016; and questionnaire used by Yousuf, Fauzi, How, Akter, & Shah, 2009). This is despite in some cases a clear statement that the element of psychosocial fundamentals of care being investigated was witnessed by a clear statement in the title of the tool (Inherent Dignity Questionnaire (IDQ), Social Dignity Questionnaire (SDQ) and Dignity Conserving Repertoire Questionnaire (DCRQ): Bagheri, Yaghmaei, Ashktorab, & Zayeri, 2018a; Bagheri, Yaghmaei, Ashktorab, & Zayeri, 2018b). However, there was limited evidence of these specific measurements being reported within the paper.…”