1999
DOI: 10.2307/4003634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test of Observer Variability in Measuring Riparian Shrub Twig Length

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percentage of browsed stems was determined for each plant by estimating the number of browsed leaders or stems and dividing by the total number of stems. The number of observers was limited to reduce the variability in observer measurement of browse (Hall and Max, 1999). Crown area was calculated by multiplying the two crown widths.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percentage of browsed stems was determined for each plant by estimating the number of browsed leaders or stems and dividing by the total number of stems. The number of observers was limited to reduce the variability in observer measurement of browse (Hall and Max, 1999). Crown area was calculated by multiplying the two crown widths.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that it is extremely difficult and time consuming to accurately measure utilization (browsing) impacts on many riparian shrubs (Hall 1999 There generally is a reduction in seed production on those plants that have utilization values above 55 percent. There can be a reduction in the overall health of plants, including size and root strength, when heavy and severe utilization levels are sustained over time.…”
Section: Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall and Max (1999) studied the differences among 15 observers who assessed utilization by measuring twig length and found that observer variability was twice the size of variability among shrubs. Thorne and others (2002) found statistically significant differences among observers for a shrub canopy volume method, although estimates from a single observer were not statistically different.…”
Section: Woody Species Regeneration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of twig length measurement found that 20 percent of the total variation was due to the observer, leading the researchers to "seriously question the feasibility of measuring riparian shrub utilization" (Hall and Max 1999). A study of precision in estimating willow canopy volume found an average CV of 25 percent, indicating large differences among observers, although variability was lower for a single observer (Thorne and others 2002).…”
Section: Introduction ____________________mentioning
confidence: 99%