2008
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0555-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test of pulse shape analysis using single Compton scattering events

Abstract: Abstract. Procedures developed to separate single-and multiple-site events in germanium detector are tested with specially selected event samples provided by an 18-fold segmented prototype germanium detector for phase II of the germanium detector array, GERDA. The single Compton scattering, i.e. single-site, events are tagged by coincidently detecting the scattered photon with a second detector positioned at a defined angle. A neural network is trained to separate such events from events which come from multi-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coincident Compton scattering measurements allowed to test the validity of our PSD calibration based on the DEP and Compton data via a comparison with single Compton scattering (SCS) events. Similar coincidence measurements for PSD validation have been carried out in the past [8,21]. The SCS data are dominated by SSE, but have a different topology than the DEP events (single electron absorption in SCS vs. an electron and a positron in DEP) and a different spatial event distribution inside the detector.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of the Psd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Coincident Compton scattering measurements allowed to test the validity of our PSD calibration based on the DEP and Compton data via a comparison with single Compton scattering (SCS) events. Similar coincidence measurements for PSD validation have been carried out in the past [8,21]. The SCS data are dominated by SSE, but have a different topology than the DEP events (single electron absorption in SCS vs. an electron and a positron in DEP) and a different spatial event distribution inside the detector.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of the Psd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Both IGEX and HM experiments used a semi-coaxial detector design but an intense work to search for new germanium detector designs aiming at improving the background suppression compared to the semicoaxial type has been developed in cooperation with manufacturers. Many efforts were devoted to apply segmented detectors to DBD experiments, applying more sophisticated techniques of background rejection than in conventional germanium detectors [186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196]. Development of Broad Energy germanium (BEGe) detectors opened new possibilities for a further improvement of this kind of experiments [197,198].…”
Section: Semiconductor Double Beta Decay Experiments Worldwidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of creating a pulse shape library for the bulk of the detector is based on the Compton effect [23][24][25][26][27][28]. A common approach [24,[26][27][28] is to irradiate the detector under test with gammas from a collimated 137 Cs source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%