2014 International Test Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/test.2014.7035350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test pattern generation in presence of unknown values based on restricted symbolic logic

Abstract: Test generation algorithms based on standard n-valued logic algebras are pessimistic in presence of unknown (X) values, overestimate the number of signals with X-values and underestimate fault coverage. Recently, an ATPG algorithm based on quantified Boolean formula (QBF) has been presented, which is accurate in presence of X-values but has limits with respect to runtime, scalability and robustness. In this paper, we consider ATPG based on restricted symbolic logic (RSL) and demonstrate its potential. We intro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average over all circuits and X-values in Table III, the fault coverage would then be less than 0.01% smaller while the runtime decreases by 68.05%. Also, a heuristic approach such as [41] can be used if the runtime is too high for large circuit instances. Figure 10 depicts the range of the additionally achieved fault coverage of the proposed accurate ATPG compared to the commercial tool for the five iterations per circuit and Xratio (cf.…”
Section: E Comparison To a Commercial Atpg Tool For Stuck-at Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average over all circuits and X-values in Table III, the fault coverage would then be less than 0.01% smaller while the runtime decreases by 68.05%. Also, a heuristic approach such as [41] can be used if the runtime is too high for large circuit instances. Figure 10 depicts the range of the additionally achieved fault coverage of the proposed accurate ATPG compared to the commercial tool for the five iterations per circuit and Xratio (cf.…”
Section: E Comparison To a Commercial Atpg Tool For Stuck-at Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%