2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-8981(04)00161-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test result variation and the quality of evidence-based clinical guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, statistically significance of the difference between two different conditions is easily reached, but may not be of clinical significance. As a consequence, the clinical relevance of the observed bias should be reviewed instead [7]. This approach allows a more relevant comparison of results obtained in samples containing a potentially interfering substance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, statistically significance of the difference between two different conditions is easily reached, but may not be of clinical significance. As a consequence, the clinical relevance of the observed bias should be reviewed instead [7]. This approach allows a more relevant comparison of results obtained in samples containing a potentially interfering substance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relies on clinical acceptance criteria determined according to the CLSI C56-A guideline [3]. Accordingly, a clinically significant interference is evidenced when the test result in the presence of the interfering substance differs more than 1.96 9 (CVa2 + CVw2)1/ 4 from the result without the interfering substance (CVa is the analytical coefficient of variation, and CVw is the within-subject biological variation) [7]. Briefly, CVa was given by the manufacturer; it corresponds to the intraassay variability of each reagent.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined clinically significant interference when the result in the presence of the interferent differs more than 1.96 Â (CV a 2 þ CV w 2 ) 1 2 from the result without the interferent. 13 Half of this deviation we call the combined CV (CV c ). The index or interferent concentration above which there is clinically significant interference is called the clinical cut-off index or concentration.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two types of variation associated with the intra-individual variation of sperm parameters after sperm preparation. First, ''analytical variation'' can be measured by quantifying the imprecision defined as the closeness of agreement between independent results of measurement obtained under stipulated conditions [Fraser 2004]. The other source of variation is the ''biologic variation'' i.e., the closeness of the sperm parameters to a homeostatic ''setting point'' for each individual [Fraser 2004].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, ''analytical variation'' can be measured by quantifying the imprecision defined as the closeness of agreement between independent results of measurement obtained under stipulated conditions [Fraser 2004]. The other source of variation is the ''biologic variation'' i.e., the closeness of the sperm parameters to a homeostatic ''setting point'' for each individual [Fraser 2004]. It is not clear what determines the ''setting point'' in semen production, whether it's the semen concentration, motility, total motile sperm or other parameter(s) [Alvarez et al 2003].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%