2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-retest reliability and minimum detectable change for various frontal plane projection angles during dynamic tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the examination, the operator replayed the movie and stopped the video when the patient's squat reached the deepest point; then, the operator took out a frame from the movie. On this frame, the knee medial/lateral deviation was defined by digital goniometer [37,38], which measures the two-dimensional position of knee, called the frontal plane projection angle [39]. This procedure only measures the momentary condition of the knee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the examination, the operator replayed the movie and stopped the video when the patient's squat reached the deepest point; then, the operator took out a frame from the movie. On this frame, the knee medial/lateral deviation was defined by digital goniometer [37,38], which measures the two-dimensional position of knee, called the frontal plane projection angle [39]. This procedure only measures the momentary condition of the knee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the most popular and commonly used, low-cost, and simple evaluation methods is 2D analysis. Research showed high reliability and good agreement in terms of the mean difference between 2D and 3D analysis of the FPPA [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. The FPPA of the knee is obtained via an angular measurement of the thigh and lower leg in the frontal plane in video analysis [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research showed high reliability and good agreement in terms of the mean difference between 2D and 3D analysis of the FPPA [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. The FPPA of the knee is obtained via an angular measurement of the thigh and lower leg in the frontal plane in video analysis [ 19 ]. Therefore, in the current study, knee valgus evaluation was performed using the FPPA method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3D analysis is a gold standard for the kinematic evaluation of DKV. However, an acceptable, cheaper, and easier to use method is a 2D analysis focusing on the assessment of the FPPA of the knee [ 22 , 23 ]. Moreover, researchers reported reliability, reproducibility, and good agreement in an average mean difference in FPPA between 2D and 3D analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%