2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of isokinetic dynamometry to assess wrist flexor muscle spasticity in subacute post-stroke hemiparesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the EMG-equipped electronical goniometer, values of MDC% both for short term and long term ranged largely, from 6.13 to 75.19%. For the isokinetic dynamometer, results are comparable to those of this study, with values of MDC% varying from 11 to 21% both for short term and long term [10,34].…”
Section: Reliabilitysupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the EMG-equipped electronical goniometer, values of MDC% both for short term and long term ranged largely, from 6.13 to 75.19%. For the isokinetic dynamometer, results are comparable to those of this study, with values of MDC% varying from 11 to 21% both for short term and long term [10,34].…”
Section: Reliabilitysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In comparison, of the EMG-equipped electronical goniometer (ICCs 0.41-0.92), the NeuroFlexor (ICCs 0.84-0.95), the isokinetic dynamometer (ICCs 0.76-0.85), and ultrasound elastography (ICCs 0.75-0.85) presented a larger variability than in this study [9,[32][33][34].…”
Section: Reliabilitycontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…The flexor muscle group is stretched at 180°/s. 33 The dynamometer records the angle of the catch and end as well as the torque of movement-related response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of our work was to implement a quantitative assessment for the resistance of the wrist joint to external perturbations, often referred to as mechanical impedance ( Hogan, 1990 ) (i.e., the dynamical relationship between wrist kinematics and torque). Taking into account the ability to quantitatively record kinematic data through robotic systems ( Colombo et al, 2005 ; Salehi Dehno et al, 2020 ), we propose a robotic measurement protocol that delivers sequences of perturbations along the flexion-extension direction of the wrist as in Falzarano et al (2020) to compute the dynamic wrist joint viscoelastic properties. Dynamic is associated with our protocol for evaluating the different components of the mechanical impedance and refers to the fact that the perturbation is sufficient to exclude modifications of the central neural drive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%