Test-Retest Reliability of a standardized psychiatric interview (DIS/CIDI)

Semler, Gert; Wittchen, Hans‐Ulrich; Joschke, K; Zaudig, Michael; Geiso, T von; Kaiser, Susan M.; Cranach, Mario von; Pfister, Hildegard

doi:10.1007/bf00383851

Cited by 98 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…11 Several studies have examined recall of anxiety and depressive symptoms during periods of 6 months to 5 years. [22][23][24][25][26][27] Those studies all report inconsistencies in recall similar to those described here. Recall of past depressive symptoms was greater for more recent symptoms 25 and higher among patients with current depressed mood.…”

Section: Commentsupporting

confidence: 47%

Stability of Somatization Disorder and Somatization Symptoms Among Primary Care Patients

Simon¹,

Gureje²

1999

Arch Gen Psychiatry

146

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Commentsupporting

confidence: 47%

Stability of Somatization Disorder and Somatization Symptoms Among Primary Care Patients

Simon¹,

Gureje²

1999

Arch Gen Psychiatry

146

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This difference in methodology (which reduces the clinical variability) could explain why the kappa values were higher. The overall reliability of the instrument for "lifetime" diagnoses (κ = 0.94) was higher than the average values reported in the literature, which ranged from 0.60 to 0.93 (15)(16)(17). No studies were found in the available literature describing the overall reliability value for the 12-month diagnoses in order to make a comparison with that of the present study (κ = 0.84).…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 76%

The reliability of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1)

Quintana

Andreoli

Jorge

et al. 2004

Braz J Med Biol Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the present study was to determine the reliability of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 2.1 (CIDI 2.1) in clinical psychiatry. The CIDI 2.1 was translated into Portuguese using WHO guidelines and reliability was studied using the inter-rater reliability method. The study sample consisted of 186 subjects from psychiatric hospitals and clinics, primary care centers and community services. The interviewers consisted of a group of 13 lay and three non-lay interviewers submitted to the CIDI training. The average interview time was 2 h and 30 min. General reliability ranged from kappa 0.50 to 1. For lifetime diagnoses the reliability ranged from kappa 0.77 (Bipolar Affective Disorder) to 1 (Substance-Related Disorder, Alcohol-Related Disorder, Eating Disorders). Previous year reliability ranged from kappa 0.66 (ObsessiveCompulsive Disorder) to 1 (Dissociative Disorders, Maniac Disorders, Eating Disorders). The poorest reliability rate was found for Mild Depressive Episode (kappa = 0.50) during the previous year. Training proved to be a fundamental factor for maintaining good reliability. Technical knowledge of the questionnaire compensated for the lack of psychiatric knowledge of the lay personnel. Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent for persons in psychiatric practice.

show abstract

“…Further, these results show that the respondents were grasping the concepts. The values also indicate that these results are as reliable as those obtained in some medical examples such as knowledge of breast removal, heart conditions and psychiatric diagnoses (Helzer, 1983;Semler et al, 1987;Wittchen et al, 1989). In fact, our values may be as good as they can get for the sample size, and may be further improved with a greater number of users.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 58%

Ecstasy abuse and dependence among adolescents and young adults: applicability and reliability of DSM‐IV criteria

Cottler

Womack

Compton

et al. 2001

Human Psychopharmacology

150

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As part of an ongoing National Institute on Drug Abuse study on the reliability of DSM substance use disorders, 173 adolescents and young adults have been interviewed to date with the CIDI-Substance Abuse Module (SAM) to determine use and abuse of and dependence on 'club drugs' and other substances. Respondents are recruited from a substance abuse program, high school ads, college dorm flyers, the internet and chain referral. Retest interviews after 5 days determined the reliability of responses. Ecstasy use was reported by 52 respondents (30%); of these users 52% were female and 23% were non-white. Nearly all users (94%) reported recent Ecstasy use. Among Ecstasy users, 'continuing to use despite knowledge of physical or psychological harm' was the most prevalent dependence criterion (63%), with excellent retest agreement (kappa = 0.66). Withdrawal (59%) and tolerance (35%) were also commonly reported dependence criteria. Hazardous use was the most commonly reported abuse symptom. Most surprising were the rates of Ecstasy use disorders: 43% met DSM-IV criteria for dependence; 34% met criteria for abuse; only 23% met neither. This is the first effort to assess the reliability of Ecstasy abuse and dependence, and the first to determine abuse and dependence using criteria specific to Ecstasy. The importance of additional studies and the relevance of such work to DSM-V are discussed. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

Test-Retest Reliability of a standardized psychiatric interview (DIS/CIDI)

Cited by 98 publications

References 16 publications

Stability of Somatization Disorder and Somatization Symptoms Among Primary Care Patients

Stability of Somatization Disorder and Somatization Symptoms Among Primary Care Patients

The reliability of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1)

Ecstasy abuse and dependence among adolescents and young adults: applicability and reliability of DSM‐IV criteria

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About