2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-retest reliability of graph metrics of resting state MRI functional brain networks: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
108
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
8
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability of network definitions and other network measures has also been investigated: previous work has demonstrated good reproducibility of functional parcellation (Laumann et al, 2015), moderate to high reliability of resting brain network boundaries across techniques (Jann et al, 2015), moderate to high reliability of network membership (Zuo et al, 2010), and low to moderate reliability for network-theory metrics of functional connectivity (Braun et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2011 cf. Andellini et al, 2015; Telesford et al, 2010). In contrast, reliability of anatomical measurements via structural MRI is quite high (Cannon et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of network definitions and other network measures has also been investigated: previous work has demonstrated good reproducibility of functional parcellation (Laumann et al, 2015), moderate to high reliability of resting brain network boundaries across techniques (Jann et al, 2015), moderate to high reliability of network membership (Zuo et al, 2010), and low to moderate reliability for network-theory metrics of functional connectivity (Braun et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2011 cf. Andellini et al, 2015; Telesford et al, 2010). In contrast, reliability of anatomical measurements via structural MRI is quite high (Cannon et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focused on two graph metrics that have been shown to be reliable: degree centrality and clustering coefficient (Braun et al, 2012; Guo et al, 2012; Andellini et al, 2015; Du et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2017). These graph metrics were derived from the weighted adjacency matrices using Brain Connectivity Toolbox (Rubinov et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full cerebellum was properly scanned in the acquisition field of view. To improve test-retest reliability, no global signal regression was conducted68; no spatial smoothing was applied, in order to avoid adding spurious correlations between adjacent voxels34. Mean BOLD time series were extracted from the 116 regions of interest (ROIs) in the standard Automatic Anatomical Labeling (AAL) atlas, which comprises 90 cerebral and 26 cerebellar regions47.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%