2020
DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1808604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test–Retest Reliability of Handgrip Strength in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used reliability figures from previous studies for all outcome measures and our results for MDC 95 calculations may have been impacted by this. We found for grip strength, an MDC 95 value consistent with that recently published for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 28 . Transformation of raw I‐RODS scores allows for adequate weighing of different disabilities on the scale, 20 and exclusive consideration of the cI‐RODS, as we used, and its MID appears consequently appropriate instead of raw scores, for meaningful use in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used reliability figures from previous studies for all outcome measures and our results for MDC 95 calculations may have been impacted by this. We found for grip strength, an MDC 95 value consistent with that recently published for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 28 . Transformation of raw I‐RODS scores allows for adequate weighing of different disabilities on the scale, 20 and exclusive consideration of the cI‐RODS, as we used, and its MID appears consequently appropriate instead of raw scores, for meaningful use in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…We used reliability figures from previous studies for all outcome measures and our results for MDC 95 calculations may have been impacted by this. We found for grip strength, an MDC 95 value consistent with that recently published for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 28. Transformation of raw I-RODS scores allows for adequate weighing of different disabilities on the scale,20 and exclusive consideration of the cI-RODS, as we used, and its MID appears consequently appropriate instead of raw scores, for meaningful use in clinical practice.The findings of the current analysis indicate that application of MID-defined cutoffs to define clinically relevant change, considering either the ONLS or cI-RODS, or grip strength, optimizes the interpretation of outcome measures as well as improves the detection of selfidentifying treatment-responders with CIDP.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The average result for the dominant hand was used for subsequent analysis. [27] Sample size As a pilot feasibility study, the objective was to test trial procedures, recruitment potential and feasibility and safety. The future trial arising from this pilot will aim for a medium effect size with 80% power; as suchBell et al…”
Section: Six-minute Walk Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…99 routine use, both in hospital as in community healthcare settings and has been validated in COPD patients. 101 Exact cut-off values for low handgrip strength vary between studies and are dependent of appropriate reference populations. Gender, age and height specific cut-off values were published by Spruit et al, 102 whereas gender specific cut-off points have been proposed by EWGSOP2: <27 kg for men and <16 kg for women, and AWGS 2019: <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women.…”
Section: Muscle Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%