2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2018.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-retest reliability of the questionnaire in the Sasang constitutional analysis tool (SCAT)

Abstract: BackgroundThe Sasang constitutional analysis tool (SCAT) is an integrated Sasang constitutional analysis system developed by the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a questionnaire for measuring personality and pathophysiological symptoms that is one of the components of the SCAT.MethodsIn this study, data were collected from university students in their twenties. Tests were administered twice, with an interval of 4 weeks between tests. Test-retest data from 17… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though there are several questionnaires for Sasang constitution-type diagnosis such as the KS-15 [ 17 ] and SCAT [ 18 ], in the KoGES cohort study, Sasang constitution type was assessed by two independent Korean medicine doctors to increase the accuracy. One Sasang constitution medicine specialist made a diagnosis of the participants' constitution based on analysis of face, voice, and questionnaire (Appendix 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there are several questionnaires for Sasang constitution-type diagnosis such as the KS-15 [ 17 ] and SCAT [ 18 ], in the KoGES cohort study, Sasang constitution type was assessed by two independent Korean medicine doctors to increase the accuracy. One Sasang constitution medicine specialist made a diagnosis of the participants' constitution based on analysis of face, voice, and questionnaire (Appendix 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These students have similar characteristics as the respondents of this study, but they did not partake in the study. The two sets of score were correlated using Pearson's Moment Correlation formula and a reliability co-efficient of .81 was gotten; this affirmed that the instrument was reliable for the study (Bolarinwa, 2015;Chiwaridzo et al, 2017;and Lee, Yim & Kim, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The statistics of Cronbach's alpha coefficients (0.924-0.936) and McDonald's omega coefficients (0.885-0.902) are summarized in Table 2, and the Guttman split-half coefficient of the physical concerns, social concerns, and cognitive concerns was 0.938, 0.906, and 0.918, respectively, suggesting that the three factors of ASI-3 had satisfactory reliability. The testretest coefficient for the physical concerns, social concerns, and cognitive concerns was 0.775, 0.596, and 0.730, respectively (P < 0.01), which revealed a moderate correlation between test and retest results (Lee et al, 2018). Moreover, we summarized the reliability parameters of other instruments used in our study in Table 2.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 80%