2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-Retest Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: A New Measure of Upper-Limb Function for Survivors of Stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
121
2
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
121
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The MDC 90 of 5.6 points that we observed means that when stable patients are assessed on two occasions, 90% of them will display random fluctuations of <5.6 points in their score. 35 Knowing the MDC allows clinicians to determine whether an observed change in the score is a true change or one associated with error/ chance: if the observed change is less than the MDC value, then this change cannot be distinguished from measurement error. 36 For example, if the change in a patient's TSK-11 score is <5.6, then one cannot be certain that that patient has truly changed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MDC 90 of 5.6 points that we observed means that when stable patients are assessed on two occasions, 90% of them will display random fluctuations of <5.6 points in their score. 35 Knowing the MDC allows clinicians to determine whether an observed change in the score is a true change or one associated with error/ chance: if the observed change is less than the MDC value, then this change cannot be distinguished from measurement error. 36 For example, if the change in a patient's TSK-11 score is <5.6, then one cannot be certain that that patient has truly changed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nos resultados notaram-se diferenças estatisticamente significantes em todas as tarefas, sendo os valores mais baixos encontrados entre os pacientes com lesão cervical e os valores mais altos entre os pacientes com lesões lombares 25 , indicando ser essa uma escala sensível para seu objetivo. 33 , a escala poderia contribuir para a avaliação na prática clínica da extremidade superior em indivíduos que sofreram AVE. O inventário CAHAI abrange movimentos finos e amplos do membro superior e mão, sendo muito eficaz para avaliar manipulação, pinça e preensão 12 . O WMFT é o teste mais utilizado no exterior para avaliar o membro superior após AVE, pois abrange movimentos funcionais dos mais simples aos mais complexos e explora a capacidade dos movimentos 16 .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…12,14,15,27,[66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] All studies used a test-retest methodology in which time frames in between assessments ranged from 1 day to 2 weeks. Nine studies utilized individuals with subacute stroke 14,15,27,[68][69][70][72][73][74] and seven studies used samples with chronic stroke.…”
Section: Detectable Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,14,15,27,[66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] All studies used a test-retest methodology in which time frames in between assessments ranged from 1 day to 2 weeks. Nine studies utilized individuals with subacute stroke 14,15,27,[68][69][70][72][73][74] and seven studies used samples with chronic stroke. 12,66,67,71,[75][76][77] Nine studies utilized a subsample of individuals from CIMT/forced use trials [66][67][68][69][70][71][72]76,77 of which four were from the EXCITE trial.…”
Section: Detectable Changementioning
confidence: 99%