Test—retest stability of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the                 Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in Chronic Pain over a Longer Period of Time

Lamé, Inge; Peters, Madelon L.; Kessels, Alfons G.H.; Kleef, Maarten van; Patijn, Jacob

doi:10.1177/1359105308093866

Cited by 101 publications

(73 citation statements)

References 25 publications

(39 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In fact, not until individuals are two standard deviations below the average level of kinesiophobia does the scale begin to produce less reliable scores. Also, shortening the scale in this manner improves efficiency for the use of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia as a measurement tool to identify fear of movement in people with arthritis and other musculoskeletal conditions which is crucial before targeted interventions (e.g., ''cognitive behavioral treatment or exposure training to reduce pain catastrophizing and pain-related fear'') in this area can be effective [29]. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

First item response theory analysis on Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (fear of movement) in arthritis

Mielenz

Edwards

Callahan

2010

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

First item response theory analysis on Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (fear of movement) in arthritis

Mielenz

Edwards

Callahan

2010

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…These properties of the TSK have been examined in populations with chronic low back pain (LBP), acute LBP, neck pain, fibromyalgia, and shoulder pain. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The TSK has good internal consistency (a ¼ 0.68-0.80), test-retest reliability up to 50 days (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] ¼ 0.72), and construct validity (the latter when tested against fearavoidance beliefs and pain catastrophizing). [14][15][16][17][18] The Dutch and Swedish versions of the TSK have good predictive and construct validity, good to excellent testretest reliability (r ¼ 0.64-0.91), and good internal consistency (a ¼ 0.70-0.81) in patients with LBP.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[14][15][16][17][18] The Dutch and Swedish versions of the TSK have good predictive and construct validity, good to excellent testretest reliability (r ¼ 0.64-0.91), and good internal consistency (a ¼ 0.70-0.81) in patients with LBP. [17][18][19][20] In 2005, the original 17-item TSK was revised to create an 11-item version known as the TSK-11, excluding ''six psychometrically poor items.'' 21(p.137) Four items were removed because their responses did not fit the pattern of a normal distribution, 21 and two others because they appeared to measure different constructs than the other items.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Fear and Avoidance of Movement in People with Chronic Pain: Psychometric Properties of the 11-Item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11)

Hapidou

O’Brien

Pierrynowski

et al. 2012

Physiotherapy Canada

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To determine the psychometric properties of the 11-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) in patients with heterogeneous chronic pain. Methods: The study evaluated test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient), cross-sectional convergent construct validity (Pearson productmoment correlation between TSK-11 and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS] scores at admission), and sensitivity to change of the TSK-11 (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve) in patients (n ¼ 74) with heterogeneous chronic pain. We used two data sets (retrospective, n ¼ 56; prospective, n ¼ 18). All patients attended the 4-week interdisciplinary chronic pain management programme at Chedoke Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario. Results: The test-retest reliability of the TSK-11 was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.58-0.93), the standard error of measurement was 2.41 (90% CI, 1.47-2.49), and the minimal detectible change score was 5.6. The correlation between TSK-11 and PCS at admission was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.43-0.73). The area under the ROC curve was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57-0.88). Conclusions: The study results provide evidence for the test-retest reliability, cross-sectional convergent construct validity, and sensitivity to change of the TSK-11 in a population with heterogeneous chronic pain.Key Words: chronic pain; pain management; reproducibility of results; Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). RÉ SUMÉObjectif : Dé terminer les proprié té s psychomé triques des 11 jalons de l'é chelle de Tampa de kiné siophobie (TSK-11) chez les patients avec douleur chronique hé té rogè ne. Mé thode : L'é tude actuelle a é valué la fiabilité test-retest (coefficient de corré lation intraclasse), la validité du construit et la validité convergente croisé e (corré lation de Pearson produit-moment entre le score de la TSK-11 et celui de l'é chelle des pensé es catastrophiques (PCS) à l'admission et la sensibilité au changement de la TSK-11 (section situé e sous la courbe ROC (caracté ristique de fonctionnement du ré cepteur) chez les patients (n ¼ 74) avec douleur chronique hé té rogè ne. Nous avons utilisé deux ensembles de donné es ré colté es de fac¸on ré trospective (n ¼ 56) et prospective (n ¼ 18). Tous les patients ont suivi le programme interdisciplinaire de quatre semaines pour la gestion de la douleur chronique de l'hô pital Chedoke du Hamilton Health Sciences. Ré sultats : La fiabilité test-retest de la TSK-11 é tait de 0,81 (IC de 95 %, 0,58-0,93), l'erreur de mesure normale é tait de 2,41 (IC de 90 %, 1,47-2,49) et le changement de score minimal dé tectable é tait de 5,6. La corré lation entre la TSK-11 et la PCS à l'admission é tait de 0,60 (IC de 95 %, 0,73). La section situé sous la courbe ROC é tait de 0,73 (IC de 95 %,. Conclusions : Les ré sultats de l'é tude font la preuve de la fiabilité test-retest, de la validité du construit et de la validité convergente croisé e et de la sensibilité au changement dans la TSK-11 chez une population aux prises avec de la douleur chronique hé té rogè n...

show abstract

“…The patient rates 17 statements that indicate whether movement related pain is a warning for re-injury. Several studies have found the scale to be a valid and reliable psychometric measure [35][36][37].…”

Section: Self-reported Questionnairesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Methodology and demographics of a single blinded, randomized controlled trial of chiropractic compared to physical therapy for balance impairments in community dwelling geriatric patients with or without low back pain

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Postural control problems effect between 28% and 35% of individuals over the age 65 and increases with age. Musculoskeletal pain in the elderly impacts 20% to 49% of people between the ages of 65 and 75, is a leading falls risk factor, and a robust predictor of morbidity. Polypharmacy in the management of chronic pain is common in the geriatric population. Conservative treatment options for balance and back pain are underrepresented in scientific literature.

show abstract

Test—retest stability of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in Chronic Pain over a Longer Period of Time

Cited by 101 publications

References 25 publications

First item response theory analysis on Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (fear of movement) in arthritis

First item response theory analysis on Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (fear of movement) in arthritis

Fear and Avoidance of Movement in People with Chronic Pain: Psychometric Properties of the 11-Item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11)

Methodology and demographics of a single blinded, randomized controlled trial of chiropractic compared to physical therapy for balance impairments in community dwelling geriatric patients with or without low back pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About