2002
DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-retest strength reliability: Hand-held dynamometry in community-dwelling elderly fallers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
173
2
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
13
173
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with results from other neurologic conditions for lower-extremity muscles tested via HHD, where comparably high values have been reported for both same-day (r = 0.91-0.99, ICCs = 0.86-0.99) and between-session (ICCs = 0.90-0.98) test-retest reliability. 21,[27][28][29][30] High reliability of a similar lateral trunk flexion protocol has also previously been reported in people with spinal cord injury (ICCs = 0.86-0.99). 35 Comparable reliability has also been reported for the non-HHD assessments used in this study: the trunk flexion test has been shown to have high reliability in people with MS (ICC = 0.995), 38 needed to detect real change outside of the inherent variability of the tests.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with results from other neurologic conditions for lower-extremity muscles tested via HHD, where comparably high values have been reported for both same-day (r = 0.91-0.99, ICCs = 0.86-0.99) and between-session (ICCs = 0.90-0.98) test-retest reliability. 21,[27][28][29][30] High reliability of a similar lateral trunk flexion protocol has also previously been reported in people with spinal cord injury (ICCs = 0.86-0.99). 35 Comparable reliability has also been reported for the non-HHD assessments used in this study: the trunk flexion test has been shown to have high reliability in people with MS (ICC = 0.995), 38 needed to detect real change outside of the inherent variability of the tests.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Handheld dynamometry has been found to have high test-retest reliability in controls, [23][24][25][26] in elderly persons who fall, 27 and in other neurologic populations. 21,[28][29][30][31] In people with MS, test-retest reliability of HHD has been reported only for knee flexion and extension, where it has been shown to have acceptable reliability.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous variables exist that could compromise the readings, from use of a handheld force transducer for assessment of trunk strength, it did appear that the amount of rotation force generated by the patient improved. Handheld dynamometers have been shown to be a reliable method of assessing strength [47][48][49] , although the use as described in this case report has not been widely reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We also measured the timed up-and-go (TUG) and one-legged standing (OLS) time as evaluations of physical performance because it has been reported that they are related to 6MWD. The maximal strength of the ankle muscles responsible for ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion were assessed using a dynamometer fixed to a footstool 16) . The TUG was performed according to the standard method that measures the time taken to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, and return to a sitting position 17) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%