2015
DOI: 10.1177/0734282914557616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Review: Wiig, E. H., Semel, E., & Secord, W. A. (2013). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fifth Edition (CELF-5)

Abstract: The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Fifth Edition (CELF-5;Wiig, Semel, & Secord, 2013) is a recently updated battery of tests designed to assess, diagnose, and measure changes in language and communication in individuals 5 to 21 years of age. Designed to identify language strengths and weaknesses, determine service eligibility, provide intervention strategies, and measure intervention efficacy, the CELF-5 assesses both oral and written language as well as non-verbal communication skills. As a Leve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a Spanish-speaking population was employed in the updated version. Therefore, we should also bear in mind a test limitation: evidence for poor test stability in some cases, (Coret & McCrimmon, 2015). Another explanation would be that despite CELF 4 generally having more items per test, the total number of tests to achieve the overall indices is bigger in CELF 5, which could result in the evaluated individuals feeling tired and not paying enough attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a Spanish-speaking population was employed in the updated version. Therefore, we should also bear in mind a test limitation: evidence for poor test stability in some cases, (Coret & McCrimmon, 2015). Another explanation would be that despite CELF 4 generally having more items per test, the total number of tests to achieve the overall indices is bigger in CELF 5, which could result in the evaluated individuals feeling tired and not paying enough attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All children and sibling controls completed a comprehensive neuropsychologic test battery that included standardized clinical measures of intelligence, language, immediate and delayed verbal and visual memory, executive functions, speeded fine motor dexterity, and academic achievement. The specific tests administered included Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, 3 rd Edition 24 , 25 ; Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing 26 , 27 ; Conners’ Continuous Performance Test, 2 nd Edition 28 ; Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test 29 , 30 ; Coding and Symbol Search Subtests of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 3 rd Edition 31 ; Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML) Design Copy 32 , 33 ; and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. 34 36 Testing was administered by psychometrists who were trained, observed, and certified on the test battery and its scoring by a pediatric neuropsychologist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CELF-5 subtests (expressive vocabulary, sentence structure and word structure) produce a standardised core language score ( M (mean) = 100, SD (standard deviation) = 15). The CELF-5 has acceptable to excellent test-retest stability in children aged five and excellent interrater reliability (Coret and McCrimmon, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%