2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test, rinse, repeat: A review of carryover effects in rodent behavioral assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 237 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the lack of changes in the control mice was less likely due to a floor effect. Another potential confound of the EPM test is its sensitivity to changes following repeated testing, typically demonstrated at intervals of 24–48 h (Cnops et al 2022). Our EPM data are less likely to be impacted by this effect as the EPM sessions were separated by 17 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the lack of changes in the control mice was less likely due to a floor effect. Another potential confound of the EPM test is its sensitivity to changes following repeated testing, typically demonstrated at intervals of 24–48 h (Cnops et al 2022). Our EPM data are less likely to be impacted by this effect as the EPM sessions were separated by 17 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning the TD task first can benefit learning the STM task via generalization 79 , or detriment learning of the STM task due to extinction or interference 80 . To determine whether direct training on the STM is possible and if so beneficial, we trained four other mice (m6, m7, m8, m9) directly on the STM task (“naïve” mice).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because this relationship is dependent on the same individual undergoing both the Bag Test and Open Field Test, only individuals that had undergone both tests within the same week were used for this analysis (n = 40 deer mice, 16 red-backed voles, and 4 woodland jumping mice). We only used the first observation of each test to reduce the impact of acclimation or learned behaviour from repeated testing (Cnops et al, 2022). To reduce the impact of temporal variables, we only used individuals that underwent both behavioural tests during the same 3-day trapping period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%