2006
DOI: 10.1518/001872006778606831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Road Experiment on Imminent Warning Rear Lighting and Signaling

Abstract: The methods and results of this study can be applied to the future design and evaluation of automotive rear-end lighting designed to reduce RE crashes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study conducted by Wierwille et al [22], an enhanced rear lighting system called ImpAltPr (improved alternating pair, flashing at 4.0 Hz) improved drivers' brake reaction times by 0.25 s (15%), similar with the results found in this experiment. Also, Gail et al [21] found that brake lights with flashing hazard lights could reduce response times by 0.23 s (13%) compared with the conventional brake system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a study conducted by Wierwille et al [22], an enhanced rear lighting system called ImpAltPr (improved alternating pair, flashing at 4.0 Hz) improved drivers' brake reaction times by 0.25 s (15%), similar with the results found in this experiment. Also, Gail et al [21] found that brake lights with flashing hazard lights could reduce response times by 0.23 s (13%) compared with the conventional brake system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Gail et al [21] summarized the literature on brake force display indicating braking intensity by means of increase in luminance and size. Wierwille et al [22] evaluated two flashing prototypes of enhanced brake systems. Li and Milgram [23] showed the effectiveness of optical looming cues of lead vehicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, ITS automations may divide attention from scanning the environment for potential hazards, which may be more informative than the visual warning display in the car. Research has shown that performing a secondary visual task reduces the driver's ability to identify the lead vehicle's brake lights, deceleration, and the optical expansion rate (Summala, Lamble, & Laakso, 1998;Wierwille, Lee, DeHart, & Perel, 2006). A second problem with ITS is that their ability to scan the headway is technologically limited in distance.…”
Section: Previous Attemptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This same study indicated that a flash rate of 4 flashes per second, or 4 Hz (Hz), was perceived to indicate the highest hazard severity compared to flash rates of 1, 2, and 3 Hz. A study of automotive rear warning lights indicated that a light flashing rate of 4 Hz was optimal (Wierwille et al, 2006). Thus, a 4 Hz flashing rate was selected for the VWS.…”
Section: Visual Warning System (Vws)mentioning
confidence: 99%