1976
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.27.020176.001343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analytical results demonstrate that the percentage of explained variation for the first factor exceeded 20% for each dimension. Moreover, the ratio of eigenvalues between the first and second factor exceeded 2, supporting unidimensionality (Lumsden, 1976). These analytical results imply that the data fulfill the unidimensionality assumption, thus meeting the assumption of local independence (Lord and Novick, 1968).…”
Section: Fit Statistics Analysis and Item Parameter Estimatessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Analytical results demonstrate that the percentage of explained variation for the first factor exceeded 20% for each dimension. Moreover, the ratio of eigenvalues between the first and second factor exceeded 2, supporting unidimensionality (Lumsden, 1976). These analytical results imply that the data fulfill the unidimensionality assumption, thus meeting the assumption of local independence (Lord and Novick, 1968).…”
Section: Fit Statistics Analysis and Item Parameter Estimatessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Lord & Novick, 1968, p. 351). As was pointed out by Lumsden (1976), the notion of unidimensionality has, however, been seriously neglected both by constructors of tests and by test theorists. The unidimensionality assumption of the Rasch model, along with the availability of goodness-of-fit tests makes, in principle at least, this model useful in investigations of the unidimensionality of sets of observations.…”
Section: Evaluating Fit When the Rasch Model Is Wed As A Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-parameter models have been extensively used (see Bock & Wood, 1971;Lord & Novick, 1968;Lumsden, 1976). Attention has been focused exclusively on scaling from the ICCs, and the PCCs have not been considered.…”
Section: Restrictions Only On the Person Dispersionsmentioning
confidence: 99%