2017
DOI: 10.1002/jqs.2970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testate amoeba as palaeohydrological indicators in the permafrost peatlands of north‐east European Russia and Finnish Lapland

Abstract: To explore the use of testate amoeba for investigating the impacts of climate change on permafrost peatland hydrology, we established a new modern training set from Arctic permafrost peatlands in north‐east European Russia and Finnish Lapland. Ordination analyses showed that water‐table depth (WTD) was the most important control on testate amoeba distribution. We developed a new testate amoeba‐based WTD transfer function and thoroughly tested it. We found that our transfer function had strong predictive power.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(116 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increases the global extent of testate amoebae as palaeohydrological indicators and opens opportunities to better understand how high-latitude ecosystems have responded to a changing climate throughout the Holocene. Individual taxa behave broadly as expected, comparing results to other studies in discontinuous permafrost (Amesbury et al, 2013;Swindles et al, 2015b;Zhang et al, 2017). Our largest anomaly was Archerella flavum, which we observe to be an intermediate indicator with an optimum WTD of around 19 cm.…”
Section: Reconstructing Water-table Depthsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This increases the global extent of testate amoebae as palaeohydrological indicators and opens opportunities to better understand how high-latitude ecosystems have responded to a changing climate throughout the Holocene. Individual taxa behave broadly as expected, comparing results to other studies in discontinuous permafrost (Amesbury et al, 2013;Swindles et al, 2015b;Zhang et al, 2017). Our largest anomaly was Archerella flavum, which we observe to be an intermediate indicator with an optimum WTD of around 19 cm.…”
Section: Reconstructing Water-table Depthsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Species-level associations with a limited range of environmental and hydrological conditions (Charman and Warner, 1992) (Zhang et al, 2017;Swindles et al, 2015b) and Canada (Lamarre et al, 2013), little is known about their ecology and effectiveness as ecological indicators in continuous permafrost. Previous studies have reported the presence of testate amoebae in both the contemporary and fossil record of continuous permafrost (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further identification to species level was carried out using a high‐power light microscope at the magnification of 100–200. Plant‐based WTD reconstruction was carried out using the modern vegetation survey data from the Siikaneva and Lakkasuo sites based on a weighted average approach; transfer function development followed the methods described in Zhang et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower resolution was sufficient where the proxy-based WTD reconstruction was used as an environmental variable in explaining carbon accumulation patterns, as carbon accumulation rate (CAR) calculations were completed at 4 cm resolution and were therefore comparable with the testate amoeba results. transfer function development followed the methods described in Zhang et al (2017).…”
Section: Proxy Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we investigated past hydrological changes and associated variations in vegetation composition during the last millennium in four permafrost peatlands. We used two different proxies; testate amoebae (Amesbury et al, 2016;Charman et al, 2007;Swindles et al, 2015b) and plant macrofossils (Väliranta et al, 2007; to reconstruct past moisture conditions and vegetation history, which enabled cross validation of results and therefore more dependable data interpretation (Loisel and Garneau, 2010;Väliranta et al, 2012). Using 14 C and 210 Pb dating, we linked detected changes to known climate periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%