“…Although inguinal [3,6,10], properitoneal [2], or even scrotal [11] approaches have been advocated for surgical correction of ASH, we decided to perform a laparotomy based not so much on the giant appearance of the abdominal portion but mainly on the inability to exclude malignancy [12,13]. The presence of septa and solid component on the current case led us to consider malignant mesothelioma, an entity that may develop in a chronic ASH [14], and raised the possibility that scrotal hydrocele might be secondary to enteric or mesenteric cyst, lymphangioma, teratoma, or pelvic neuroblastoma [7,14]; however, ultimate diagnosis was ASH, the solid component being because of intralesional hemorrhage, a complication not previously recorded.…”