2001
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.2001.1409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing a Convective-dispersive Model of Two-dimensional Root Growth and Proliferation in a Greenhouse Experiment with Maize Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a statistic proposed by Reddy and Pachepsky (2001) to test the difference between 3D fine root distribution patterns of the two tree species. This statistic compares within-species variation and between-species variation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a statistic proposed by Reddy and Pachepsky (2001) to test the difference between 3D fine root distribution patterns of the two tree species. This statistic compares within-species variation and between-species variation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models were rarely related to meaningful growth parameters that could explain the changes taking place in the root length density profiles through time. Reddy and Pachepsky (2001), Heinen et al (2003), and Bonneu et al (2012) have proposed the use of advection-diffusion equations to describe temporal changes in root spatial distribution in soil. In each case, the methods proposed could reliably mimic the spread of the root system in soil, but the models used in these studies were very simple and could not provide information on parameters such as the branching rate or the elongation rate of lateral roots.…”
Section: Using Models To Extract Root Growth Parameters From Experimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since some form of density estimation is required during an optimization process to compare a model with experiments, why not simulate the root system as a density distribution directly? This was the original idea of Reddy and Pachepsky (2001), Heinen et al (2003), Bastian et al 2008, andBonneu et al (2012). However, because their density model was a generic advection-diffusion equation, it was not possible for them to obtain biologically meaningful growth parameters from their model.…”
Section: Parameter Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the latter case, analytical methods can provide simple growth functions (de Willigen et al, 2002;Schnepf et al, 2008). Approximated numerical solutions can also be obtained to analyse more complex systems (Reddy and Pachepsky, 2001). However, density-based models were seldom used to model ensembles of interacting plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%