2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing allometric equations for prediction of above-ground biomass of mallee eucalypts in southern Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to [17], a strong, negative relationship was found between brightness reflectance and vegetation coverage (r = 0.81); this relationship represents the bare soil spots that result from the mining activities in the study site. The TCW is a highly weighted (positively) spectral variable with CHM (r =0.78); this relationship supported the modeling approach to estimate the biomass according to the canopy heights [13,27]. Fourth, Zhao et al [28] stated that the multiple linear models with height-related metrics estimate the biomass variation better than the profile-related metrics because the biomass is directly related to the height and/or DBH, whereas the canopy-profile-based metrics provide very limited information.…”
Section: Major Findingssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly to [17], a strong, negative relationship was found between brightness reflectance and vegetation coverage (r = 0.81); this relationship represents the bare soil spots that result from the mining activities in the study site. The TCW is a highly weighted (positively) spectral variable with CHM (r =0.78); this relationship supported the modeling approach to estimate the biomass according to the canopy heights [13,27]. Fourth, Zhao et al [28] stated that the multiple linear models with height-related metrics estimate the biomass variation better than the profile-related metrics because the biomass is directly related to the height and/or DBH, whereas the canopy-profile-based metrics provide very limited information.…”
Section: Major Findingssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The Jenkins allometric equations model are suitable for predicting the biomass based on DBH for different coniferous species [26][27][28], Jenkins et al [22] estimated the biomass as follow:…”
Section: Allometric Equations and Ground Lidar Metrics From Individuamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The notable exception was the Generic mallee-form Eucalyptus allometric model which yielded relatively precise predictions when individuals were selected evenly on the natural scale. This is because mallee plantings are typically established by tube stock rather than by seed, resulting in relatively low spatial variability in stand density (Paul et al 2013c), and relatively low variability in individual stem diameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allometric models are useful for assessment of aboveground-biomass (AGB) and net primary productivity (ANPP) of forests [1][2][3] and shrubs [4][5][6]. They are widely utilized for forest inventory and management because they offer a non-destructive, relatively accurate, and labor-efficient method [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%