2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing and initial verification of the world's first metal 3D printed bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
98
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical curves for the as-built 3.5 mm, as-built 8.0 mm and machined coupons are shown in Figures 14-16, respectively, alongside the average test results for Ex and ̅ xy (markers). The test results act as anchor points to the theoretical curves at θ =0° and θ = 90° since they feature directly in Equations ( 6)- (9).…”
Section: Variation Of Elastic Constants With Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical curves for the as-built 3.5 mm, as-built 8.0 mm and machined coupons are shown in Figures 14-16, respectively, alongside the average test results for Ex and ̅ xy (markers). The test results act as anchor points to the theoretical curves at θ =0° and θ = 90° since they feature directly in Equations ( 6)- (9).…”
Section: Variation Of Elastic Constants With Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to powder-bed fusion AM processes, the cost and manufacturing time of larger components built through WAAM is lower as the deposition rate is much higher, i.e., of the order 2-4 kg/h [6]. Recently, WAAM method has been successfully applied to manufacture various large-scale parts and structures i.e., marine propeller-bracket [7], stainless-steel diagrid column [8], landing gear rib [9] and a 12.5 m long metal footbridge [10]. Ding et al [4] confirmed that the limitations of the other AM processes are increasing the demand for the WAAM process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to powder-bed fusion AM processes, the cost and manufacturing time of larger components built through WAAM is lower as the deposition rate is much higher, i.e., of the order 2-4 kg/h [6]. Recently, WAAM method has been successfully applied to manufacture various largescale parts and structures, i.e., marine propeller-bracket [7], stainless-steel diagrid column [8], landing gear rib [9], and a 12.5 m long metal footbridge [10]. Ding et al [4] confirmed that the limitations of the other AM processes are increasing the demand for the WAAM process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%