2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing and modelling of material behaviour and formability in sheet metal forming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
0
89
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of this situation, engineers are engrossed on determining methods such as the finite element method (FEM) to acquire precise predictions about geometrical parts, post-forming characteristics and improving design processes. Bruschi et al [13] studied the prediction of possible defects and failures on the basis of process parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of this situation, engineers are engrossed on determining methods such as the finite element method (FEM) to acquire precise predictions about geometrical parts, post-forming characteristics and improving design processes. Bruschi et al [13] studied the prediction of possible defects and failures on the basis of process parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first characterises the flow behaviour of the sheet and the second predicts the forming limit under defined conditions [4]. The yield locus is used to describe the plastic behaviour of the sheet metals with a normal plastic anisotropy.…”
Section: Materials Properties and Materials Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft materials usually show a high n-value, where high strength materials have a low one. For the FEM-approach, S. Bruschi [4] divides strain hardening into four different types: (a) isotropic strain hardening, (b) kinematic hardening, (c) rotational hardening, and (d) distortional hardening. Fig.…”
Section: Flow Curve and Strain Hardeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, more complex yield functions like Yld2000-2D [5], BBC2000 [6] and Vegter [7] were developed in order to describe the yield surface shape more accurately and improve the results of numerical simulations. As these yield functions need additional points in stress space, extensive efforts for experimental testing and parameter identification are required [1]. Additional testing data of biaxial, plain strain and shear specimen is commonly used to model an accurate material response with these complex yield criteria.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forming simulation supports engineers and toolmakers in the prediction of forming behaviour, formability and final part properties during the process design. In order to comply with the progressive demands in reducing the discrepancy between numerical prediction and experimental results, an improvement of the phenomenological modelling of forming behaviour combined with efficient experimental testing is of high relevance [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%