Testing and unpacking the effects of digital fake news: on presidential candidate evaluations and voter support

Abstract

There is growing worldwide concern that the rampant spread of digital fake news (DFN) via new media technologies is detrimentally impacting Democratic elections. However, the actual influence of this recent Internet phenomenon on electoral decisions has not been directly examined. Accordingly, this study tested the effects of attention to DFN on readers’ Presidential candidate preferences via an experimental web-survey administered to a cross-sectional American sample (N = 552). Results showed no main effect of exposure to DFN on participants’ candidate evaluations or vote choice. However, the perceived believability of DFN about the Democratic candidate negatively mediated evaluations of that candidate—especially amongst far-right ideologues. These results suggest that DFN may at worst reinforce the partisan dispositions of mostly politically conservative Internet users, but does not cause or induce conversions in these dispositions. Overall, this study contributes novel experimental evidence, indicating that the potential electoral impact of DFN, although concerning, is strongly conditional on a reciprocal interaction between message receptibility and a pre-existing right-wing ideological orientation. The said impact is, therefore, likely narrow in scope.

Destructive Trends Of Digital Culture: “Side Effects” Of New Media

“…In particular, we are talking about fake news using fake texts, photo and video materials, an artificially created image of a person, which is carried out using Internet bots, fake accounts and other technologies. According to scholars, digital fake news is "deliberately fabricated news stories that are designed to appear credible and spread over the Internet (Leyva & Beckett, 2020). In the modern era, "unreliable, fake news, disseminated as an "alternative" point of view, including through electronic, digital communications, has an impact on public consciousness and largely shape the opinion of citizens (Shushpanova, 2018).…”

Commemoration leaders: cultural memory of a city in the digital age

“…The digital transformation of social reality and of numerous communication processes has not gone unnoticed by scientists. Now, digital media are becoming a vital part of people's social experience and defining aspects of their daily lives (Leyva, Beckett 2020). Of particular concern to researchers is the fact that the trends in the development of digital culture have also led to the emergence of both social and cultural risks, including fragmentation of society, increased individualization, as well as global changes in the everyday life of today's youth (Kravchenko 2019: 50).…”

Shifting Behaviors and Attitudes of Socially Stigmatizing Illnesses to Improve Wellbeing: A Conceptual Framework for Epilepsy

“…This means that attitudes and behaviors are created, sustained, or inspired for change if punishment or a reward exists. In connection to social constructivism, learning theories in this study stand on the philosophical position that individuals are not blank slates concerning aspects of the world; they have pre-existing knowledge, attitudes, and varied cognitive resources [46]. For this reason, it was important for researchers to explore existing knowledge, attitudes, awareness, and practices toward epilepsy.…”