2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/focs.2016.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Assignments to Constraint Satisfaction Problems

Abstract: For a finite relational structure A, let CSP(A) denote the CSP instances whose constraint relations are taken from A. The resulting family of problems CSP(A) has been considered heavily in a variety of computational contexts. In this article, we consider this family from the perspective of property testing: given an instance of a CSP and query access to an assignment, one wants to decide whether the assignment satisfies the instance, or is far from so doing. While previous works on this scenario studied concre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that appropriate versions of polymorphisms have been used extensively in many CSP complexity/approximability classifications: standard polymorphisms for decision and counting CSPs, for approximating Min CSPs and testing solutions (in the sense of property testing) [6,7,20,21,[24][25][26]48], fractional polymorphisms for exact optimisation problems [41,47], α-approximate polymorphisms for approximating Max CSPs [17]. In all cases, the presence of nice enough polymorphisms (of appropriate kind) leads directly to efficient algorithms, while their absence leads to hardness.…”
Section: Relatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that appropriate versions of polymorphisms have been used extensively in many CSP complexity/approximability classifications: standard polymorphisms for decision and counting CSPs, for approximating Min CSPs and testing solutions (in the sense of property testing) [6,7,20,21,[24][25][26]48], fractional polymorphisms for exact optimisation problems [41,47], α-approximate polymorphisms for approximating Max CSPs [17]. In all cases, the presence of nice enough polymorphisms (of appropriate kind) leads directly to efficient algorithms, while their absence leads to hardness.…”
Section: Relatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous work on testing assignments to the problems CSP(A) studied concrete templates A or restricted classes of structures, this article presents a comprehensive classification of the constant query complexity templates. The results in this paper were first announced in [15]. Before describing our characterization, we introduce the algebraic notion of a polymorphism which is key to the description and obtention of our results.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near unanimity operations have played an important role in the development of universal algebra and first appeared in the 1970's in the work of Baker and Pixley [1] and Huhn [15]. More recently they have been used in the study of the CSP [13,16] and related questions [2,12]. The main results of this paper can be expressed in terms of the CSP and also in algebraic terms and we start by presenting them from both perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%