2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-020-00370-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing automatic methods to predict free binding energy of host–guest complexes in SAMPL7 challenge

Abstract: The design of new host–guest complexes represents a fundamental challenge in supramolecular chemistry. At the same time, it opens new opportunities in material sciences or biotechnological applications. A computational tool capable of automatically predicting the binding free energy of any host–guest complex would be a great aid in the design of new host systems, or to identify new guest molecules for a given host. We aim to build such a platform and have used the SAMPL7 challenge to test several methods and d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In protein–ligand docking, the conformations of ligands binding to receptor proteins were assessed, and the binding energies between protein–ligand pairs were quantified. Whenever a ligand interacts with a protein, electrons are involved in the formation of covalent or noncovalent bonds [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. These pi-alkyl and pi-sulfur interactions belong to the broad category of noncovalent interactions [ 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In protein–ligand docking, the conformations of ligands binding to receptor proteins were assessed, and the binding energies between protein–ligand pairs were quantified. Whenever a ligand interacts with a protein, electrons are involved in the formation of covalent or noncovalent bonds [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. These pi-alkyl and pi-sulfur interactions belong to the broad category of noncovalent interactions [ 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three variants of GFNn-xTB that are developed ( n = 0, 1, and 2), which differ in accuracy and efficiency. They have been successfully applied in the optimization of organometallic complexes, structure sampling, exploring the reaction profiles, and macromolecule structure optimization. In addition, the electronic effects are still included at the semiempirical level of theory, which are challenging systems for the DFT method . The empirical FF parameters for the GFN2-xTB method are fitted to reproduce the results of DFT (B97-3c) .…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TrimerTrip submissions included 3 ranked and 4 non-ranked, GDCCs included 4 ranked and 12 non-ranked, and CD-derivatives had 3 ranked and 6 non-ranked (Figure 5). For a large portion of methods submitted, docking was used to obtain starting structures, and one submission used self association molecular dynamics (SA-MD) [96]. General classical fixed charge force fields were commonly used, as has become common in SAMPL host-guest challenges (see Section 6.1.2 for methods submitted to SAMPL7 host-guest challenge).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and polarizable force fields (AMOEBA) [94], different charging schemes (AM1BCC [92,95], RESP [95]), several explicit water models (TIP3P [92], TIP4P-Ew [95], OPC [93]) and even implicit solvent [95]. Outside of simulation-based free energy methods, quantum mechanical (QM) and QM/MM (molecular mechanics) approaches were also used [95], and one group employed machine learning [96]. In addition, several groups submitted multiple predictions (particularly for the GDCCs) and the ensuing results are important to provide insight and give merit to the methods used here.…”
Section: Participant Calculation Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation