2003
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.68.012315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Bell’s inequality and measuring the entanglement using superconducting nanocircuits

Abstract: An experimental scheme is proposed to test Bell's inequality by using superconducting nanocircuits. In this scheme, quantum entanglement of a pair of charge qubits separated by a sufficiently long distance may be created by cavity quantum electrodynamic techniques; the population of qubits is experimentally measurable by dc currents through the probe junctions, and one measured outcome may be recorded for every experiment. Therefore, both locality and detection-efficiency loopholes should be closed in the same… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our investigation is based on the spin matrix structure of the S-matrix itself, which allows to deduce any polarization configuration of the outgoing particles in dependence of the incoming particles, for which even spin entanglement can be accounted for. We point out that the generation of entanglement is studied for example for the polarization of photons [66], internal electronic states of trapped ions [67], the spin of electron-hole pairs in solids [68], charge qubits in superconducting nanocircuits [69] or polarization and orbital angular momentum of photons [70] (see also [71]) and is therefore of interest for the scientific community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our investigation is based on the spin matrix structure of the S-matrix itself, which allows to deduce any polarization configuration of the outgoing particles in dependence of the incoming particles, for which even spin entanglement can be accounted for. We point out that the generation of entanglement is studied for example for the polarization of photons [66], internal electronic states of trapped ions [67], the spin of electron-hole pairs in solids [68], charge qubits in superconducting nanocircuits [69] or polarization and orbital angular momentum of photons [70] (see also [71]) and is therefore of interest for the scientific community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This loophole was closed in two recent experiments (Weihs et al, 1998;Tittel et al, 1998). It is now obvious that to close both loopholes simultaneously in the same experiment still remains a challenge (He et al, 2003). I believe that there may be a way simultaneously around both of these problems if we utilize two entangled human neuronal basins in the following manner.…”
Section: A New Technique For Resolving the Bell Inequality Loopholes ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second loophole, that of locality, states that whenever measurements are performed on two spatially separated particles, any possibility of signals propagating with a speed equal or less than the velocity of light between the two parts of the apparatus must be excluded (He et al, 2003). This loophole was closed in two recent experiments (Weihs et al, 1998;Tittel et al, 1998).…”
Section: A New Technique For Resolving the Bell Inequality Loopholes ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the examples is two two-level atoms interacting with an electromagnetic field. [16] Another example is coupling two charge qubits through an interaction with a single-mode cavity field, [17] and the entanglement between two charge qubits induced by a coherent state field has been discussed. [18] The interaction of the thermal field and a quantum system composed of two qubits has been studied and it has been found that such a chaotic field with minimal information can nevertheless entangle qubits that are prepared initially in a separable state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%